Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Earth Day 2000 is a symbolic date. Aside from being the first Earth Day of the new millennium, for thirty years, people have marked April 22 as a day to honor the sacredness, complexity and beauty of the Earth. Since 1970, environmentalists of various stripes and persuasions have set aside this one day of the year as a symbol of hope for the future. As Green researchers, policymakers and advocates, we rely on hope and dreams. We dream of a future filled with cultures of concern, and concrete expressions of intra/intergenerational equity and justice - a world where our children and their children's children are demonstrating a life of peace and harmony with each other, other peoples and the natural world. But, in looking to the future, we need to remember past patterns, processes and mindsets. We cannot construct futuristic ecologies without first exploring our personal, sociopolitical and ecological histories, and honoring our past. In a technocratic, Western world where new is better, and the old is relegated to the waste paper bin, we need to begin by reusing and recycling past concepts and visions. Though, such attempts will not come without a struggle. For years, I have had to endure great fits of laughter from some colleagues for suggesting that, for example, alternative transportation in a developed country actually might include horse and buggy. My position is that if there are Mennonites who can retain this element of the past even in the face of modernist obstacles, why should we not encourage a future of horses and stables in cases where this is possible however bizarre this may seem? My godmother who was born in 1899 once described to me how life use to be. As a young child growing up in Montreal, she told me of a time when she use to ride to school in the mornings, joyfully waving to other children from her carriage. She spoke of the bonds that her family had with their horses, and the community webs that were created by this relatively environmentally-friendly and socially-cohesive mode of transportation. For some communities, such a long forgotten and romantic concept may be a real, viable and pragmatic policy option. Indeed, if we abide by strong animal rights measures, as living beings; horses would be more energy efficient and ecological than most current forms of transportation. Yes, again, I recognize that I am putting forth one unconventional policy option! This said, embedded within the above example is a question for those who are opposed to the idea: how socially and individually resistant do we feel towards past ideas and techniques? For the most part, the Western system rejects or forgets the old, the past and rushes for the latest packaged goods and services. It separates the generations - the old from the new, allows our children to wrongly learn that new means better, and in the world of academia, calls for more up-to-date, cutting-edge research (how many times have you heard that a book is outdated?). This system insists upon new news and fresh manufactured material. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».