MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2330442483 · doi:10.4027/bamnpr.2007.03

Movement patterns of black rockfish (Sebastes melanops) in Oregon coastal waters

2007· article· en· W2330442483 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven J. Parker, Polly S. Rankin, J.M. Olson, Robert W. Hannah

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMarine and fisheries research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSebastesRockfishFisheryMovement (music)ScorpaenidaeGeologyOceanographyFish <Actinopterygii>BiologyArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We studied the movement patterns of black rockfish (Sebastes melanops) in Oregon coastal waters to estimate home range over daily to annual time scales, determine if females relocate during the reproductive season, and evaluate the influence of environmental variation on movement. We moored 18 acoustic receivers in a 3 × 5 km array south of Newport, Oregon, at depths from 9 to 40 m. We then surgically implanted 42 black rockfish (34-48 cm total length [TL]) with coded, pressure transmitters having an approximate lifespan of 6 months. Fish were tagged in August (n = 6), September (n = 13), October (n = 7), and February (n = 8 depth and 8 non-depth). Fish were temporarily absent from the monitored area for short periods (usually 39 cm (likely mature) from the array were longer in duration than for mature males, especially during the reproductive season (November, January, and February), but both sexes had the longest absences during April through July. These data indicate that black rockfish in open coastal waters live in a very restricted area for long periods as adults, but may relocate periodically. A small home range could make them susceptible to local depletion from targeted fishing, but also make them good candidates for protection using marine reserves. 40 Parker et al.—Movement Patterns of Black Rockfish Introduction Understanding movement patterns and behavior is fundamental to understanding the ecology of a species. Defining an area of normal activity or home range and determining home range size stability is critical in developing strategies to manage local populations (Vincent and Sadovy 1998). In the nearshore environment along the northeast Pacific coast ( 7 m). In addition to logistical challenges, most rockfish suffer barotrauma when captured due to the expansion of gas in their physoclistic swim bladder (Parker et al. 2006). This trauma makes choosing an individual likely to survive capture more risky, makes surgical tagging more difficult, and requires additional studies to conclude that the barotrauma has no significant impact on subsequent movement behavior. Few acoustic telemetry studies of rockfish exist for these reasons. These telemetry studies have typically addressed only a few of these constraints, often by facing great logistical hurdles (Matthews 1990; Pearcy 1992; Starr et 41 Biology, Assessment, and Management of North Pacific Rockfishes al. 2000, 2002). Our study used receiver moorings specifically designed to withstand wave and current action for long periods, yet be periodically retrievable by boat. We also removed excess swim bladder gas at the surface and used surgical implantation of transmitters. Our objectives were to document annual, seasonal, and diel movement patterns of black rockfish, estimate home range size under different environmental conditions, and evaluate female movement during the reproductive season off the Oregon coast. Understanding black rockfish movement patterns with high resolution on both short and long time scales will provide fundamental information necessary to define local population characteristics, movement patterns and pathways, make habitat associations, and aid in the design of MPAs. Materials and methods Study area and acoustic array This study was conducted in the Pacific Ocean near Newport, Oregon, at depths of 9-40 m, within an area normally fished by the recreational groundfish fishery (Fig. 1). We monitored the study site using a rectangular array of 18 VR2 69-kHz omni-directional acoustic receivers (Vemco Ltd., Nova Scotia, Canada) designed to monitor for transmitters in a 1,500 hectare area. The receivers were individually anchored on single buoy lines according to manufacturer specifications, approximately 5 m off bottom. The receivers recorded tag code, receiver number, date, time, and depth of the transmitter (for depth transmitters) at a known location. Range testing showed a normal detection range of 350-500 m radius, and receivers were spaced 700 m apart to allow tags to be detected by more than one receiver. Some receivers were moved slightly to avoid shielding by observed bathymetric features. If during the study, a receiver was lost, it was replaced as soon as possible. We also moored a tag within the array for 27 days to provide an indication of horizontal positioning accuracy and precision. Tagging Fish were captured by barbless hook and line fishing throughout the study area using typical recreational fishing gear periodically from August 2004 through February 2005. We attempted to catch and tag fish throughout the monitored area to minimize transmission interference from multiple tags in the same area and to gather data on fish living at different depths. Coded acoustic V-13 HP transmitters (69 kHz, pressure sensitive [0-50 m] 155 dB output, 13 × 42 mm) were programmed to transmit at a random period of between 30-90 seconds, giving an expected battery life of 6 months (Vemco Ltd.). Black rockfish (34-48 cm TL) were vented to release excess pressure from the expanded swim bladder using an 18 gauge hypodermic needle. No anesthesia 42 Parker et al.—Movement Patterns of Black Rockfish

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,047

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations28
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetMarine and fisheries research→Travaux en français237 207→