International comparison of life conditions for female wheelchair basketball athletes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The present study was conducted to clarify the actual conditions of daily life and sport activity for female wheelchair basketball athletes with physical disability, and to analyze the similarities and differences between Japan and other countries. A survey was conducted during the International Wheelchair Basketball Friendship Games Osaka Cup, which was held on February 19-21, 2009, and attended by Japan, Australia, Canada and the USA. A questionnaire based on the previous studies of Warkings (2004) and Woodson (2008) was distributed to a total of 43 athletes, and the main results were as follows: Similarities: 1) Motivation or will to win was very strong among athletes who were facing fierce competition. 2) For this reason, the athletes hoped for the more professional support to help them improve and develop their skills and techniques for wheelchair basketball. 3) The athletes expressed concern about the expenditure, as well as the time required, for training and competition, and therefore hoped for some form of financial assistance. 4) The athletes hoped for more facilities that were gender-friendly, as well as barrier-free. 5) The athletes were aware of a feeling of unity or bonding with team-mates through their practice, as well as in games. There was a common feeling that among athletes, there is no distinction as to whether or not people have physical disability, or the country they are living in. Differences: 1) Japanese athletes wanted more information via various media, whereas athletes from other countries wanted extensive access to the Internet. 2) Japanese athletes expressed a wish for better job opportunities or work conditions, whereas foreign athletes hoped to raise public awareness of the need for financial support. 3) Japanese athletes considered that more media exposure would increase public understanding about the disabled, whereas athletes from other countries hoped for improvements in public education about disability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».