Health related quality of life results through week 22 from the CERTIFI study, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase2b study of Ustekinumab in patients with moderately to severely active Crohnʼs disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the Phase 2b CERTIFI study, ustekinumab (UST) has been shown to induce and maintain clinical response in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) who had previously failed (lack of initial response or subsequent loss of response) or did not tolerate TNF antagonist(s). This analysis examines the impact of UST on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in CD over the course of induction and maintenance through 22wks of treatment. Patients with a CDAI score ≥ 220 and ≤ 450 who had previously failed or been intolerant of ≥1 TNF antagonists were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive IV PBO or UST (1-, 3-, or 6-mg/kg) at wk0. At wk8 patients who received IV UST induction and were either responders (≥100 CDAI decrease) or non-responders at wk6 were re-randomized separately to SC maintenance therapy with 90mg UST or PBO at wks8 and 16, and assessed for maintenance efficacy at wk22. The inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ), assessing the 4 dimensions of bowel symptoms, emotional function, systemic symptoms, and social function, was administered at wks0 (baseline), 6 and 22. Mean change from baseline in IBDQ and each dimension of the IBDQ, as well as the proportion of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID), defined as a ≥16 point improvement from baseline in IBDQ, were assessed at wk6 and wk22. In CERTIFI (N=526), median age was 38 years and 58.7% of patients were female. In the induction phase, among the 500 patients analyzable for IBDQ, the combined patients randomized to IV UST had a baseline mean (SD) IBDQ score of 115.5(28.64) vs 119.5(26.69) for IV PBO. For the 1-, 3-, and 6-mg/kg IV UST doses, mean improvement from baseline in IBDQ at wk6 (19.9, 22.7, and 24.8, respectively) was statistically significant vs that seen with PBO (11.8), (p<0.05 for all comparisons). The proportion of patients with a MCID at wk6 was 33.1% on PBO vs. 45.0% on IV UST 1 mg/kg (p=.057), 47.7% on 3 mg/kg (p=.018), and 54.7%among those randomized to 6 mg/kg (p<0.001). Changes in IBDQ dimension scores from baseline to wk6 (bowel symptoms, emotional function, systemic symptoms, and social function) were each significantly improved in combined IV UST vs. IV PBO patients, (p<0.05 for all comparisons). Of the 145 responders to IV UST induction therapy who were re-randomized in the maintenance phase, the mean(SD) IBDQ score at wk22 was 158.8(38.58) among those who continued to receive SC UST, vs 138.5(39.71) of patients rerandomized to SC PBO (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with a MCID was 68.1% (47/69) among those who continued to receive SC UST vs 44.9% (31/69) of patients re-randomized to SC PBO (p=0.005). At wk22, mean IBDQ dimension scores in wk6 UST responders remained significantly higher with SC UST compared to SC PBO maintenance, (p<0.05 for all comparisons). In patients with moderate-to-severe CD who had failed previous TNF antagonist(s), IV UST induction therapy significantly improved HRQOL compared to PBO. During maintenance with SC UST, significant improvement in HRQOL in responders to induction was maintained through wk22.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».