P1-S2.25 HIV serostatus knowledge, absence of previous testing and sexual behaviours among injecting drug users
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Few studies have examined the association between HIV status knowledge and sexual behaviours among injection drug users (IDUs). We tested the hypothesis that IDUs who know their HIV positive status will have safer sexual practices than IDUs aware of their HIV negative status or never tested for HIV. Methods IDUs who had injected in the past 6 months were recruited in harm reduction programs across the Province of Quebec and Ottawa, Canada. Participants completed a questionnaire including questions on sexual behaviours and provided saliva for HIV antibody testing. For IDUs with multiple participations, the last interview was selected. Data from 2003 to 2009 were analysed. Three groups were compared—IDUs aware of their positive HIV status (n=510), IDUs aware of their HIV negative status (n=2928) and IDUs never tested for HIV (n=427). Proportions were compared using χ 2 tests. Results Male IDUs aware of their positive HIV status were less likely to have had sex in the last month (HIV positive—32.4%, HIV negative—47.2% and never tested—55.0%; p<0.0001, n=2741) and, among those sexually active, more likely to have used a condom at last sexual intercourse (HIV positive—57.4%, HIV negative—43.7% and never tested—51.7%; p<0.005, n=1249). This was not observed for women. In the last 6 months, the proportion of male IDUs who had always used condoms for vaginal or anal sex with their female sex partners was significantly higher in HIV positive than in HIV negative and in those never tested, for regular (54.3%, 22.4% and 33.1%, respectively, p<0.0001, n=1131), casual (77.4%, 54.4% and 51.2%, respectively, p=0.0002, n=933) and partners of whom they are a client (86.7%, 69.7% and 42.1%, respectively, p<0.02, n=123). Women never tested for HIV were less likely than the other groups to use condoms with their regular partners (never tested—4.7%, HIV positive—21.3% and HIV negative—20.2%; p<0.05, n=550) and their client sex partners (never tested—46.2%, HIV positive—82.1% and HIV negative—76.6%; p<0.05, n=259). Women aware of their HIV positive status were more likely to report condom use with their casual sex partners, whereas those never tested were less likely (HIV positive—66.7%, HIV negative—48.0% and never tested—15.8%; p<0.01, n=250). Conclusions IDUs aware of their positive HIV serostatus reported more consistent condom use with their various types of sex partners than those aware of their HIV negative status or never tested.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».