MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2331374569 · doi:10.2514/6.2002-1906

Scintillation Fade and Enhancement Duration Statistics at 20, 40 and 50GHz

2002· article· en· W2331374569 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali Savvaris, C.N. Kassianides, Ifiok Otung

Notice bibliographique

Revue20th AIAA International Communication Satellite Systems Conference and Exhibit · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueSatellite Communication Systems
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFadeScintillationDuration (music)OpticsStatisticsEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingPhysicsMathematicsGeologyDetectorAcoustics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Statistics of observed durations of scintillation fades and enhancements of the ITALSAT satellites at 20, 40 and 50GHz are presented for various threshold signal levels, and their use in fade countermeasures is examined. The analysis shows that most signal amplitude deviations from the mean level are of short duration and do not depend on the threshold level. Distribution of fade durations at thresholds 0.1 and 0.5dB were reasonably well approximated by the lognormal function. Introduction The saturation of C-band and the ever-increasing demand for new services that require greater bandwidth has led to the exploitation of higher frequencies. The higher frequencies offer various advantages such as, increased bandwidth, smaller antennas, and smaller satellite footprint that give higher EIRP and permit frequency reuse. The main obstacle however is that they are subject to stronger propagation degradation. The small size antennas employed in VSAT and USAT systems significantly reduce the cost of earth station terminals and also eliminate tracking requirements, but they lose the mitigating effect of aperture averaging and hence experience stronger scintillation [1]. Scintillations are rapid fluctuations in amplitude and phase of the received signal arising from fluctuations in the atmospheric refractive index due to turbulence. Increasing the transmitted power or the receiving antenna diameter to provide an adequate fade margin is often not feasible in VSAT systems. An alternative scintillation countermeasure, which is being investigated, is the use of Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes and adaptive modulation schemes. Link budget engineers use annual and worst month cumulative distribution functions to calculate the link budget for a new satellite communication system. The use of digital signal processing however requires the knowledge of the dynamics of tropospheric scintillation, including the distribution of scintillation fade duration and inter-fade interval. Fade duration statistics are particularly important for the design of high frequency satellite systems. In such high frequency systems, operating at a fixed small fade margin, the best way to mitigate propagation impairments is by introducing adaptive techniques, adaptive fade countermeasure strategies. Fade and interfade duration statistics provide the system designer with useful information for evaluating various mitigation techniques that will be employed to ensure a given system availability and quality of service. In this paper attention is focused on the analysis of scintillation fades and enhancements at 18.7, 39.6 and 49.5 GHz, which will be hereafter referred to as the 20, 40 and 50GHz, respectively, using propagation data from the ITALSAT F1 and ITALSAT F2 satellites. Experiment and Analysis ITALSAT was Italy's first operational communication satellite launched on the 16 of January 1991 by an Ariane booster and stationed in geostationary orbit at 13.2 degrees east. The design life for the ITALSAT vehicle originally was only five years, but ITALSAT F1 operated beyond its expected life, facilitated by the adoption of a propellant saving option in which the North/South station keeping was abandoned. As a consequence it became necessary for the beacon receivers to track the satellite position. Towards the end of 1997 the 50 GHz beacon receiver at Sparsholt was equipped with a tracking unit to counter the problem. The same goal was attained for the 40 GHz receiver in August 1998 [2]. The data examined can be divided into two sets: a) Data set 1: This contains data measurement from the ITALSAT F2 satellite, operating at 20 GHz and covering a 1-year period from September 99 to August 2000. b) Data set 2: This contains data measurement from the ITALSAT F1 satellite, operating at 40 and 50 GHz and covering a 1-year period from September 96 to August 97. 20th AIAA International Communication Satellite Systems Conference and Exhibit 12-15 May 2002, Montreal, Quebec, Canada AIAA 2002-1906 Copyright © 2002 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Both data sets were recorded at Sparsholt (51.0814°N, 1.3947°W), UK at a path elevation of 30° and at a sampling rate of 1 Hz. Cassegrain antennas of diameters 1.22m for the 20 GHz and 0.61m for both the 40 GHz and 50 GHz beacons were employed. The propagation data together with a range of meteorological measurements recorded at the same sampling rate were archived to a compact disk once a month. Pre-processing of the raw propagation data was carried out. This involved visual inspection of graphs of the data to identify gaps and spurious samples, and high-pass filtering using a 6 order Butterworth filter with a cut-off frequency of 0.04 Hz to extract scintillation [3]. Distribution of Scintillation Fade & Enhancement In Figure 1, the observed annual cumulative distributions of scintillation fades and enhancements at 20, 40 and 50GHz are presented. It can be seen from this figure, that for 0.01% of the time the fade levels at 20 and 50GHz are 0.8 dB and 1.5 dB, respectively. This represents an increase in the scintillation signal amplitude by a factor of 1.88.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,611
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue20th AIAA International Communication Satellite Systems Conference and ExhibitMême sujetSatellite Communication SystemsTravaux en français237 207