P-101 Incidence of Anti-drug Antibodies in Crohnʼs Disease Patients During 5 Years of Certolizumab Pegol Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Any biologic drug, whether human, chimeric, or “humanized,” can cause an immune response, leading to antidrug antibody (ADAb) formation which can cause treatment failure of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. The prevalence of ADAb is dependent upon multiple factors, including assay type, route of administration, dosing schedule, and use of concomitant treatments. Currently, no robust long-term ADAb prevalence data exist for any of the TNF antagonists that are used to treat Crohn's disease. We evaluated the prevalence of certolizumab pegol ADAb (CZP-ADAb) with long-term treatment. Patients who enrolled in C87085 (a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study) and either: (1) had disease deterioration in the first 2 weeks of the trial (defined as an increase in Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] ≥70 points relative to baseline or absolute CDAI ≥350 points); or (2) completed the 6-week trial and were eligible for inclusion in C87088 (a 5-year, open-label extension [OLE] study). Regardless of treatment assignment during the placebo-controlled C87085 trial, all patients in C87088 received CZP induction of 400 mg at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by maintenance therapy with CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks until week 262. Plasma concentrations of CZP and CZP-ADAb were measured by ELISA in samples collected prior to dosing at weeks 0, 6, 32, 52, 100, 160, 208, and the Final/Withdrawal visit. Patients were considered CZP-ADAb positive if the titer was >2.4 units/mL at any time. The cumulative frequency of patients with CZP-ADAb was defined as the number of patients who were CZP-ADAb positive at each visit (numerator) divided by the number of evaluable patients (denominator). Overall, 10.2% (41/402) of patients were CZP-ADAb positive over the course of both studies; 3 patients (all in the C87085 CZP 400 mg group) had developed CZP-ADAb between the start of C87085 and the start of C87088. Development of CZP-ADAb most frequently occurred within the first 32 weeks of treatment during C87088. The cumulative frequency of CZP-ADAb detected was ≤6.2% at each time point measured. As expected, geometric mean CZP plasma concentrations were substantially lower in patients who were CZP-ADAb positive (range of means during C87088: 0.88–15.25 μg/mL, excluding the Withdrawal visit) compared with those who were CZP-ADAb negative (range of means during C87088: 8.33–29.89 μg/mL, excluding the Withdrawal visit). No meaningful differences were observed in the types or prevalence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, or AEs leading to discontinuation of medication\study withdrawal between ADAb-positive and -negative patients based on CZP-ADAb status. A total of 41 patients (10.2%) were CZP-ADAb positive over the course of both the qualifying study (C87085) and this 5-year OLE study, C87088. Meaningful differences in AEs, serious AEs, or AEs leading to withdrawal based on CZP-ADAb status were not observed. Given the small number of patients who were positive for CZP-ADAb, no conclusions can be drawn with regard to the effect of CZP-ADAb status on disease improvement with treatment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».