Toward the inclusion of parents on pediatric critical care unit rounds*
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Inclusion of parents on interprofessional patient rounds is increasingly recognized as a parental right and as a marker of quality care in pediatric intensive care units. Creating policies and practices that welcome parents and their contributions into patient rounds has proven challenging in many settings. OBJECTIVE: To develop a detailed understanding of the physical, professional and interpersonal contexts of one pediatric intensive care unit in order to develop a feasible, relevant and sustainable approach to parental inclusion on rounds. DESIGN: Prospective qualitative and descriptive exploratory survey. SETTING: A pediatric Intensive care unit at a tertiary care children's hospital. SUBJECTS: Physicians, nurses and other health care professionals working in our pediatric intensive care unit and to all parents who had children admitted to the unit during a one month period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Surveys were distributed to physicians, nurses and other health care professionals working in our pediatric intensive care unit and to all parents who had children admitted to the unit during a 1-month period. In addition in-depth interviews were conducted with a subset of 13 healthcare providers. Descriptive statistics were used to report survey results. Transcripts of the interviews and the qualitative comments provided on the surveys were analyzed according to principles of interpretive description. Parents indicated a strong desire to participate in pediatric intensive care unit rounds, while healthcare providers varied in the extent to which they believed parents' participation would achieve the intended goals. Key considerations that need to be addressed for successful practice change to incorporate parents on rounds include: working on consistent and reliable communication, addressing the issues of confidentiality, time constraints, and teaching during rounds, and attention to the role of parents during rounds and health care professionals' facilitation of that role. CONCLUSION: The participants in this study believed that parents' participation on rounds is an important consideration. For inclusion of parents to be effective and sustainable, policy and practice change in this direction requires measures to recognize parents as important contributors to pediatric intensive care unit rounds while accounting for the complex responsibility of healthcare providers in the physical and social space of the pediatric intensive care unit.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».