V4-12 ROBOTIC SUPRAPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY- A NOVEL TECHNIQUE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessJournal of UrologyRobotics – Prostate/Novel Imaging1 Apr 2016V4-12 ROBOTIC SUPRAPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY- A NOVEL TECHNIQUE Mona Yezdani, Abdo Kabarriti, Sylvia Yu, Alice McGill, Kelly Monahan, and David Lee Mona YezdaniMona Yezdani More articles by this author , Abdo KabarritiAbdo Kabarriti More articles by this author , Sylvia YuSylvia Yu More articles by this author , Alice McGillAlice McGill More articles by this author , Kelly MonahanKelly Monahan More articles by this author , and David LeeDavid Lee More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.1816AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy has evolved in many ways through technologic advances. Treatment options include endoscopic, open, laparoscopic, and robotic interventions. Simple robotic prostatectomy has been described using many different techniques including retrovesical, transvesical, and extraperitoneal approaches. In this video, we demonstrate a novel robotic approach to the simple suprapubic prostatectomy. The demonstrated technique is recognizable and easily adaptable for those skilled in radical robotic prostatectomy. METHODS The start of this surgery is similar to radical approach with incision of the umbilical ligaments, dropping of the bladder, and incision of endopelvic fascia. The superficial venous complex is sutured. The bladder neck is dissected as we normally do for a robotic prostatectomy. The bladder neck is dissected until the Foley catheter is identified. The foley catheter is pulled anteriorly and used as a retractor. The prostatic adenoma can now be seen. The posterior bladder neck is now dissected. Verumontanum is identified. Dissection of the adenoma is begun posteriorly. Anteriorly, the lateral planes are established and this plane is continued all the way around to the very near to the apex of the prostate bilaterally. The anterior prostate is then divided in half to expose the anterior of the prostatic urethra. The adenoma is then removed. The distal apical urethral tissue was identified. The verumontanum is inspected and confirmed to be intact. #3-0 Quill suture is used to re-approximate the bladder neck to the urethra in a running fashion starting at the 5 o'clock position up until 12 o'clock position. An 18-French Foley catheter is placed and the remaining lateral bladder incision is closed with a running #3-0 V-lock. RESULTS This method has multiple advantages. It allows familiarity for those who have performed a radical robotic prostatectomy. In comparison with the open approach, it provides improved visualization. Our approach provides improved hemostasis. An 18 Fr catheter is placed at the end of the case. A suprapubic tube and continuous bladder irrigation are not necessary. This approach allows for quick recovery. Our patients are typically discharged on POD #1 with an indwelling Foley catheter. Given our watertight urethral approximation, the risk of urine leakage is very low. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, our novel technique for robotic suprapubic simple prostatectomy is easily adaptable for those who are familiar with a robotic radical prostatectomy. The next steps of this study will be to assess for functional outcome after the procedure. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e520 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Mona Yezdani More articles by this author Abdo Kabarriti More articles by this author Sylvia Yu More articles by this author Alice McGill More articles by this author Kelly Monahan More articles by this author David Lee More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».