MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2332144522 · doi:10.1055/s-0032-1319867

Chondroadherin Fragmentation as a Biochemical Marker for Early Stage Disk Degeneration

2012· article· en· W2332144522 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Bashar Alkhatib, Rahul Gawri, Patrik Önnerfjord, Jean Ouellet, Peter J. Roughley, Thomas Steffen, Lisbet Haglund

Notice bibliographique

RevueGlobal Spine Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Établissements canadiensMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExtracellular matrixDegeneration (medical)Fragmentation (computing)MedicineIntervertebral diskCell biologyPathologyLumbarIntervertebral discPathologicalCellular senescenceAnatomyBiologyGeneticsPhenotype

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Intervertebral disk (IVD) degeneration has been strongly associated with and named a major cause of back pain. At present, little is known about the molecular mechanisms involved in the degeneration of IVD and how these may differ from normal turnover of the tissue. As a result of this, a biomarker for disk degeneration has not yet been identified and we propose chondroadherin (CHAD) fragmentation as a potential option. CHAD, a protein of the leucine rich repeat (LRR) family, is one of the proteins predominantly expressed in the extracellular matrix of cartilaginous tissue, including that of the IVD. This restricted distribution is unusual among LRR proteins, which commonly show a wide tissue distribution. CHAD is primarily found close to the cells, where it can interact with collagen fibrils of the ECM and molecules at the cell surface, providing a mechanism for regulating cell metabolism and ECM structure. These interactions may also aid in promoting matrix homeostasis, and variation in CHAD abundance or structure might therefore lead to pathological changes in the tissue over time. The aims of this study were to determine whether CHAD fragmentation occurs and is unique to disk degeneration, and to characterize the cleavage site within CHAD at which fragmentation occurs. Materials and Methods Healthy and degenerate lumbar IVDs were obtained through organ donations via Transplant Quebec. IVDs from patients with degenerative disk disease and from patients with scoliosis were obtained at the time of surgery. Punches of 4 mm were taken and disk tissue then extracted using 15 volumes of extraction buffer (4 M GuCl, 10 mM EDTA, COMPLETE, 50 mM NaAc, pH 5.8) on a wet weight per volume basis. Extracted proteins were ethanol precipitated, and CHAD fragmentation was studied using SDS-PAGE and western blotting in combination with specific antibodies. To characterize the CHAD cleavage site, a degenerate disk extract was subjected to CsCl density gradient centrifugation to remove proteoglycans. CHAD was purified from the protein fraction by chromatography through carboxymethyl 52. The CHAD-containing samples were then fractionated on an SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie Blue. Gel portions containing the CHAD fragment were excised, then lyophilized, reduced and alkylated, and subjected to trypsin digestion. Peptides were then identified by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Antineoepitope antibodies specifically recognizing the fragmented CHAD were generated by immunizing rabbits with synthetic peptides conjugated to KLH. The peptides represented the terminal amino acid sequences at the site of CHAD fragmentation. Results Proteolytic fragmentation of CHAD was observed in IVDs from patients with DDD and in some individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Its presence appeared to be related to the degree of degeneration in both cases (Fig. 1). This phenomenon was found to be specific to disk degeneration, as CHAD fragmentation was not observed in healthy adolescent and adult disks from organ donors. Within the degenerate disk, fragmentation was evident in tissue with signs of degeneration but not in tissue that had no signs of degeneration. This same trend was also seen when comparing normal and degenerate disk tissue from different levels of the spine from the same donor. Upon analysis with the antineoepitope antibody, it was apparent that CHAD fragmentation occurred at the same site in degenerate disks from Transplant Quebec donors, surgical samples from adults with DDD, and surgical samples from adolescents with AIS. Normal tissue samples showed no antineoepitope antibody binding, confirming that CHAD fragmentation at this site was not present in the healthy disk. Conclusion CHAD fragmentation is associated with disk degeneration present both in the adult with DDD and the adolescent with scoliosis, and fragmentation is created by cleavage at the same site within both disorders. Fragmentation is not, however, present in normal disk tissue. Thus, CHAD fragmentation may distinguish catabolic processes leading to disk degeneration from those associated with normal turnover of the tissue, and as such serve as a marker of disk degeneration. It is necessary to recognize the biochemical processes that specifically contribute to disk degeneration, if degeneration is to be prevented or retarded, and if novel treatments initiating disk regeneration are to be developed. The mechanism leading to fragmentation and the proteinase involved are currently under investigation. I confirm having declared any potential conflict of interest for all authors listed on this abstract Yes Disclosure of Interest None declared

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,724
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,946

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,323 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGlobal Spine JournalMême sujetSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyTravaux en français237 207