MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2333013521 · doi:10.1093/brain/awt230

Dementia: from muddled diagnoses to treatable mechanisms

2013· article· en· W2333013521 sur OpenAlexaff
Vladimir Hachinski, Luciano A. Sposato

Notice bibliographique

RevueBrain · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDementiaAutopsyVascular dementiaMedical diagnosisMedicineDiseaseAlzheimer's diseasePediatricsPsychiatryGold standard (test)Prospective cohort studyInternal medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Despite growing knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms and improved characterization of clinical syndromes, the classification of dementia remains conflicting and confused; and there is inconsistency in applying commonly used classification systems for the diagnosis. In a study of 1879 subjects, aged 65 years or older (Erkinjuntti et al., 1997) the highest prevalence was found when using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-III criteria (DSM-III), being 10 times more than the lowest prevalence, based on the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) (29.1% versus 3.1%; Erkinjuntti et al., 1997). A similar level of inconsistency exists when trying to group cognitive disorders into different categories such as ‘vascular dementia’ and ‘Alzheimer’s disease’. Sensitivity for the clinical diagnosis of ‘Alzheimer’s disease' can be as high as 90% when using autopsy reports as the gold standard (Galasko et al., 1994). However, these numbers may be biased. In a prospective clinicopathological study comprising 163 controls and 307 cases from a university hospital clinic, two sources of bias were identified (Bowler et al., 1998). First, a verification bias in that the proportion of deaths of patients undergoing autopsy differed substantially from those who were not autopsied (Bowler et al., 1998). Among those patients with an initial clinical diagnosis of ‘Alzheimer’s disease', ‘vascular dementia' or ‘mixed dementia’ who did not have an autopsy, 22% had not progressed after a median follow-up of 2.6 years (range 0–11.6 years). This means that at least 22% of these patients potentially had conditions other than ‘Alzheimer’s disease', ‘vascular dementia' or ‘mixed dementia', as the explanation for their cognitive impairment; and as they did not die, they were not included in the denominator of the autopsy series (Bowler et al., 1998). The authors conclude that progressive dementia is over-represented in autopsy-based data. The second source of bias is a ‘dual diagnosis fallacy’ related to the role of cerebrovascular pathology identified in autopsies of patients originally categorized as having pure ‘Alzheimer’s disease' (Bowler et al., 1998). Using standard clinical and pathological criteria, the positive predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of ‘Alzheimer’s disease' is 81%. However, after reclassifying cases with any extent of infarction as ‘mixed dementia’ if they are accompanied by pathological changes of ‘Alzheimer’s disease', and after re-categorizing cases with ‘Alzheimer’s disease' with other co-existing diagnoses (other than ‘mixed dementia') as ‘other dementia’, the positive predictive value of a diagnosis of ‘“Alzheimer’s disease” falls to 44%’ (Bowler et al., 1998). Furthermore, the combined effect of the dual diagnosis fallacy and the verification bias leads to further reduction in the positive predictive value to 38% (Bowler et al., 1998). ‘Alzheimer’s disease' and ‘vascular dementia' are thought to be the most common causes of dementia. Thus, the incorrect diagnoses and lack of adequate pathophysiological characterization of dementing disorders likely results in missed opportunities for identifying treatable and preventable causes, such as vascular disease. Recognizing the vascular component of dementias is imperative from a prevention standpoint. The Hachinski Ischaemic Score was designed for and serves as a useful clinical instrument for identifying this vascular component (Knopman et al., 2001). However, there is still much to learn about the pathophysiological reciprocal interaction of cerebrovascular disease and neurodegenerative disorders. In this issue of Brain, Toledo et al. (2013) report on the prevalence of cerebrovascular disease (vascular pathology considered as a primary or contributing neuropathology), vascular pathology (vascular findings reaching or not a threshold sufficient enough to contribute to clinical status), and vascular risk factors among autopsy samples of patients with single neurodegenerative diseases, including ‘Alzheimer’s disease', frontotemporal lobar degeneration due to tau accumulation, and TAR DNA binding protein 43 immunoreactive deposits, α-synucleinopathies, hippocampal sclerosis and prion disease (Toledo et al., 2013). The study comprises 6205 autopsy cases from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Centre Database; 5715 with neurodegenerative diseases, 210 samples of unremarkable brains, and 280 brains with cerebrovascular disease. The prevalence of vascular pathology is higher in ‘Alzheimer’s disease' than in α-synucleinopathy, frontotemporal lobar degeneration-tau and -TAR DNA binding protein associated disease, prion disorders, and unremarkable brains. The prevalence of cerebrovascular disease is also higher in ‘Alzheimer’s disease' than in α-synucleinopathy, frontotemporal lobar degeneration-tau and -TAR DNA-binding protein disorders, and prion disease. As expected, this is more prevalent in younger patients. Another important finding is that the presence of cerebrovascular disease in cases with α-synucleinopathy is associated with an increased risk of dementia in addition to the increased risk in ‘Alzheimer’s disease'. Interestingly, with the exception of prion disease and hippocampal sclerosis, vascular pathology is present in ∼60–80% of degenerative diseases. Together, these findings support the hypothesis of neurovascular processes as key targets for preventing or reducing the pace not only of ‘vascular dementia', but also degenerative dementias. Neuropathological studies have greatly contributed to the understanding of different types of dementias, but they are limited to description of consequences of the dementing processes, rather than being able to identify the pathophysiological mechanisms occurring during the presymptomatic stage. Newer in vivo approaches, such as novel neuroimaging techniques including PET and MRI, genetic and epigenetic studies, and the use of biomarkers with the potential to identify patients at risk, have led to a new era in exploration of the presymptomatic pathophysiology of dementias. In vivo PET scanning can detect amyloid-β deposition in the human brain and is beginning to be used as a clinical diagnostic tool in strictly defined subsets of cognitively impaired patients (Johnson et al., 2013). Developments are underway to identify specific components of amyloid plaques (i.e. cathepsin D) with the use of new MRI contrast agents (Ta et al., 2013). The role of some genetic factors (e.g. amyloid precursor protein gene, presenilins 1 and 2, and ApoE) in the genesis of dementia has been widely demonstrated (Paulson et al., 2011); and epigenetic studies are shedding light on the impact of gene expression on brain ageing (Akbarian et al., 2013). There is growing interest in the role of biomarkers (i.e. plasma and CSF amyloid-β and total or hyperphosphorylated tau) in the diagnosis of dementia (Noel-Storr et al., 2013). The association between elevated homocysteine and dementia turns plasmatic hyperhomocysteinaemia into an attractive biomarker candidate (Wald et al., 2011). Hooshmand et al. (2013) report the results of their investigation on the association of baseline plasma homocysteine determinations and neuropathological and neuroimaging findings in 265 subjects from the population-based cohort of Vantaa 85+ study (Hooshmand et al., 2013). The authors found an independent association between elevated baseline plasma homocysteine and increased burden of neurofibrillary tangles at the time of death. In the group of 103 subjects who had post-mortem MRI, higher homocysteine levels are independently associated with periventricular white matter hyperintensities and more severe medial temporal lobe atrophy. These findings have at least two important implications. First, hyperhomocysteinaemia could be considered as a potential biomarker for dementia. Second, and perhaps most important, elevated plasmatic homocysteine detected during early life could potentially become a new target for the prevention or the delay of dementia. Evidence of shared risk factors for cerebrovascular disease and degenerative dementias continues to accrue (Akinyemi et al., 2013). There are also mounting data supporting the idea of mutually influencing and closely interacting cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative processes (Zlokovic, 2011). The studies of Toledo et al. (2013) and Hooshmand et al. (2013) strongly contribute to this vision. A worldwide ageing population means that the burden of dementia is rising. On the basis of current evidence, and in the face of the failure to mitigate this healthcare problem, we can now argue that classifying dementias into vascular, mixed and degenerative disorders is, at best, strained and does not offer significant improvements in the treatment of patients. It is crucial to build better profiles based on clinical, neuropsychological, imaging, genetic, pathological, epidemiological, and experimental evidence for defining cognitive impairment by using minimum common standards (Hachinski et al., 2006). If the same standard descriptions are used, we can begin to build evidence-based provisional criteria, refined by every new study. Better criteria and in vivo studies of interactive mechanisms of disease will likely result in new approaches and new results. Meanwhile, we propose: (i) making available a simple and reliable tool for diagnosing cognitive impairment; (ii) generating awareness about the importance of the screening and detection of the vascular component; (iii) offering the best available prevention options for those patients in whom a vascular component is identified; and (iv) evaluating this approach. This would be the first step in closing the gap between the promise and the proof of treating vascular cognitive impairment (Hachinski, 1994). Toledo et al. (2013) and Hooshmand et al. (2013) provide a strong rationale for shifting our emphasis from muddled diagnoses to treatable mechanisms.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,659
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations15
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBrainMême sujetDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTravaux en français237 207