MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2333029569 · doi:10.1093/jis/ett047

Al-Andalus Rediscovered: Iberia's New Muslims By MARVINE HOWE

2013· article· en· W2333029569 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Akasoy

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Islamic Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHispanic-African Historical Relations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPeninsulaContext (archaeology)ImmigrationIslamHistoryAncient historyTheme (computing)GeographyEthnologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Iberian Peninsula deserves for several reasons the attention of those studying the history and culture of the Islamicate world. Although al-Andalus became part of Dār al-Islām fairly early, it turned into an outlier in the mid-eighth century when Umayyad rule survived the ‘Abbasid revolution in the far West. The Iberian Peninsula is also the only major landmass among the Umayyad conquests which did not remain under Muslim rule. The Muslims and Jews of Iberia were victims of the first European genocides. In the last few decades, immigration from North and sub-Saharan Africa to Portugal and Spain has added a new dimension to the long historical relationship between this southwestern part of Europe and Islam. The present book, at least judging from its title, seeks to explore the state of ‘Iberia’s new Muslims’ in the light of the area’s history. While there is no preface to the volume which would describe what exactly its aim is, the topics of the thirteen chapters confirm the impression that there is not one clearly defined theme which lends coherence to the book. The first chapter deals with the humanitarian crisis of immigrants arriving by boat on the shores of southern Spain, the unfolding of this crisis in a European context and Iberian responses to it. Most of these immigrants are Muslims and Spain can be increasingly seen as following the pattern of other Western European countries with significant Muslim minorities. A distinctive feature of Iberia, however, is its Muslim past and ch. 2 surveys different academic approaches to this history. Chapter 10 deals with the history of the persecution of the Iberian Jews and efforts of modern community leaders to raise awareness of this history. Most of the book, however, is more exclusively concerned with the modern period. Chapters 3 and 4 cover the early Muslim immigration to Iberia in the 1960s, the labour market for immigrants and Islamic terrorism, in particular the events of 11 March 2004 and the aftermath. Chapter 5 focuses on Iberian strategies of dealing with immigration and cultural diversity. The author returns to these subjects in chs. 11–13. She notices that the Iberian governments and public are more sympathetic towards immigrants and more tolerant as far as religious and cultural diversity are concerned. Chapters 6 to 9 explore Muslim life and public activities in Spain and Portugal. In many respects, Portugal offers more reason for optimism than other Western European countries. The distinctive demographics of the Muslim population of Portugal may explain why this part of the population has experienced less alienation, marginalization and segregation than in France, Germany or the Netherlands. Many Portuguese Muslims are of South Asian origin, but have come to Portugal via Mozambique. The community also includes a large number of Ismailis, Lisbon being the sect’s third important centre after Toronto and London. Furthermore, the author accounts for the frequently observed fact that Spain constitutes an exception among Western nations—although hard hit by a terrorist attack, Spain has not curbed its civil liberties. The relatively recent dictatorships in both Iberian countries are still present in people’s memories. Lands of emigration and economic hardship, both states share features of the countries of origin of the Muslim emigrants.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,255
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Islamic StudiesMême sujetHispanic-African Historical RelationsTravaux en français237 207