Low CD34 Cell Dose Is Associated With Higher Non-Relapse and Overall Mortality After Reduced Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation For Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In allogeneic hematopoetic cell transplantation (HCT) using myeloablative conditioning, the nucleated and CD34 cell doses were found to be of importance for several outcome parameters including survival, relapse and graft- versus- host disease (GVHD). Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HCT is increasingly used for older patients and for younger patients with co-morbidities. Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) is the predominant graft for RIC HCT. There is no large study of the effect of CD34 cell dose in the setting of RIC transplantation. Therefore, we studied the effect of CD34 dose on 1057 patients aged 45 – 75 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplasic syndrome (MDS) who received RIC regimen HCT between 2000 and 2011. Patients received grafts from HLA-matched siblings (n = 370) or from volunteer adult unrelated donors matched at the allele-level at HLA-A, -B, -C and –DRB1 (8/8; n = 522) or mismatched at 1 HLA-locus (7/8; n = 178). All patients received peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC), low dose TBI regimens (200 cGy) or alkylating agent plus fludarabine containing regimens. Separate analyses were conducted for HLA-matched and unrelated donor transplants. For HLA-matched sibling transplants (AML n=301; MDS n=69), exploratory analysis identified differences in survival for CD34 dose less than 4 x 106/kg. Multivariate modeling, adjusting for performance score, disease status, cytogenetic risk and transplant period, showed transplantation of PBPC with CD34 dose < 4 x 106/kg was associated with higher risks of overall mortality (HR 1.48, p=0.008) and non-relapse mortality (HR 2.03, p=0.004) compared to transplantation of PBPC with CD34 dose ≥ 4 x 106/kg. The effect of CD34 dose was independent of the other factors associated with mortality. The likelihood of neutrophil (HR 0.76, p=0.03) and platelet recovery (HR 0.76, p=0.03) was also lower with CD34 dose < 4 x 106/kg containing PBPC grafts. CD34 dose was not associated with acute or chronic GVHD or disease recurrence. In contrast, after unrelated donor transplantation (AML n=557; MDS n=130), the effect of CD34 cell dose on mortality was marginal. Exploratory analysis identified differences in survival for CD34 dose less than 6 x 106/kg. After adjusting for age, performance score, disease status, interval from diagnosis to HCT, and HLA-match, transplantation of PBPC with CD34 dose < 6 x 106/kg was associated with marginally higher risks for overall mortality (HR 1.20, p=0.05) and non-relapse mortality (HR 1.38, p=0.02) compared to transplantation of PBPC with CD34 dose ≥ 6 x 106/kg. There were no significant differences in hematopoietic recovery, acute or chronic GVHD and disease recurrence by CD34 dose. Further, we did not identify a CD34 dose for either donor source above which acute or chronic GVHD risks were higher. In conclusion, in the setting of RIC transplants for AML and MDS, the data support optimizing PBPC collections such that the CD34 dose delivered is in excess of 4 x 106/kg for HLA-matched sibling and CD34 dose in excess of 6 x 106/kg for unrelated donor transplants. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».