Women Making News: Gender and Journals in Modern Britain (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Women Making News: Gender and Journals in Modern Britain Rosemary T. VanArsdel (bio) Michelle Elizabeth Tusan, Women Making News: Gender and Journals in Modern Britain (Champaign, IL.: University of Illinois Press, 2005) pp. x + 306, $45.00 cloth. Michelle Tusan introduces her book by stating that "between 1856 and 1930 female proprietors published over 150 political journals and newspapers targeted at female audiences" (l). So it is perhaps not surprising that the most valuable features of this carefully researched book are (l) the Appendix, "A Bibliography of British Women's Advocacy Periodicals," which also offers an invaluable location file, and (2) the book's bibliography itself. Each of these sections offers an exhaustive listing of sources, not previously unknown, but scattered widely and not before available in such complete and concentrated form. The titles in the Appendix can be-and no doubt have been-checked against the Waterloo Directory for accuracy, but on the whole this appears to be a definitive presentation. Together, these references provide the foundation for endless new research in the [End Page 269] rapidly evolving field of women's journalism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The book's subtitle, "Gender and Journals in Modern Britain," aptly summarizes the objectives of this study, which are twofold: first, to chart the rise, from the 1860s onward, of new specialized periodicals conducted by women and promoting such diverse agendas as suffrage, international and domestic feminism, social reform, education and employment opportunities for women, and more specifically, temperance, anti-vivisection, anti-Contagious Diseases Acts, spiritualism, and votes for women; and second, to illustrate how the women's press provided new and unusual forms of employment for women. It is important to note that carrying on these ventures was often fraught with difficulties. Most were privately funded, either by the editor herself or by some small advocacy society. Advertising was virtually nonexistent. Circulation and distribution were uncertain. Copy was usually at the mercy of unpaid female staff. For most it was a constant struggle to keep afloat from issue to issue. The Woman's Signal is a prime example of a journal begun with high energy and optimistic ideals that failed after only three and a half years due to lack of financial and readership support. However, as nonprofit enterprises these publications were free to promote political and social ideas which were not part of the common culture. From the rich bibliographical background which the author has provided she constructs chapters on such topics as the origins of the women's political press in Britain, the rise of women in the political community, suffrage advocacy, women's periodicals in wartime, and the assessment of political culture after World War I. As Tusan asserts: "The multiplicity of opinions among women in a host of movements . . . all found expression within the pages of women's periodicals" (6). As the twentieth century progressed, the interwar years diluted the strength of women's advocacy journalism in favor of a united effort against a common enemy, but at its zenith it had represented an important chapter in the rise of female activism. Anyone wishing to chart that rise and all of these movements will do well to consult this volume as a starting point. The author has also done fellow scholars a service by identifying and locating many new archival sources for research into women's activism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. While much of this material has been known to researchers, many other sources are newly identified. By pulling all these bibliographical and archival references together Tusan has made a real contribution to future research. [End Page 270] Rosemary T. VanArsdel University of Puget Sound Rosemary T. VanArsdel Rosemary T. VanArsdel, Distinguished Emeritus Professor of English at the University of Puget Sound, originated, and updates annually, "Victorian Periodicals Aids to Research: A Selected Bibliography" on the Victorian Research Web (http://victorianresearch.org/periodicals.html). Her most recent publication is a biography of journalist Florence Fenwick Miller. Copyright © 2007 Victorian Periodicals Review
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».