P4-11-08: Changes in the Distribution of Loco-Regional and Distant Breast Cancer Recurrences over the Last 20 Years: Implications for Patient Care and Future Research.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Improvements in adjuvant therapy have led to a sustained fall in recurrences after early breast cancer. The differential reduction of both local-regional and systemic recurrences is poorly understood. This study aimed to explore changes in the distribution of loco-regional and distant recurrences in clinical trials reported over the last 20 years. We also aimed to determine the relative impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Methods: A MEDLINE search for adjuvant, Phase III randomized breast cancer clinical studies between January 1990 and March 2011 was performed. Neo-adjuvant, single agent biologics and studies that did not report the proportion of loco-regional and distant recurrences were excluded. Change in the frequency of recurrences was assessed as the non-parametric correlation between the number of loco-regional recurrences (as a proportion of all recurrences) and time. Studies were weighted by sample size. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were assessed using the interaction test and included type of surgery performed, radiotherapy use, menopausal status and type of systemic therapy delivered. Definition of local and distant recurrences differed between studies. For consistency, loco-regional recurrences were classified as recurrences limited to the ipsilateral breast, chest wall, axillary, supraclavicular and internal mammary lymph nodes. Any other recurrence was defined as distant, with the exception of contralateral breast cancer; that was excluded from this analysis. Results: Fifty-three randomized clinical trials with a total of 86,598 patients were included in the analysis. Between 1990 and 2011, the proportion of loco-regional recurrences has decreased from approximately 50% to 10% (Spearman's rho = −0.40, p<.001). There was no interaction between type of surgery (mastectomy vs. lumpectomy, p=0.40), adjuvant radiotherapy use (p=0.63) and menopausal status (p=0.95) and the correlation of loco-regional recurrences and time. Chemotherapy use showed a larger negative correlation compared with endocrine therapy (rho = 0.49 vs rho = 0.24, p=0.008). Conclusion: Advances in treatment of early breast cancer have differentially reduced the proportion of loco-regional recurrences compared with distant recurrences. In recent trials, loco-regional recurrences account for less than 10–15% of all recurrences. These falling event rates may affect patient care, especially when deciding on treatments influencing loco-regional control. This change may also impact on the design of clinical trials assessing loco-regional therapy such as surgery and/or local radiation therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-08.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,026 | 0,056 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».