P-050 High Rates of Steroid Dependence Amongst IBD Patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Corticosteroids are effective for induction of clinical remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but are neither safe nor effective for maintenance of remission. Given their adverse effects and association with poor long-term outcomes, minimization of steroid use is a goal of therapy, and the use of steroid-sparing agents is indicated in patients that are steroid-dependent. We examined the patterns of steroid utilization within Canada. Health claims data was purchased from IMS Brogan (including regional-private and national-private aggregate, and two different public plans). These databases do not contain ICD-9 codes and did not allow for differentiation of IBDs. As 5-ASA is a unique therapy for IBD, patients were indexed based on a claim for 5-ASA in the first month and followed for 12 consecutive months. We measured steroid utilization amongst 5-ASA claimants as follows: Fraction with ≥ 2 prednisone claims/year, fraction with a first and last prednisone claim >90 days apart, and median days elapsed between first and last prednisone claim in those with ≥ 2 prednisone claims. Utilization was characterized amongst different database types (public/private), genders, calendar years, age categories, and concomitant IBD therapies. The databases comprised 19,613 patients with a claim for a 5-ASA product in January 2011. The group was ∼50% male, and 70% were aged 20–65 years old. The median number of 5-ASA claims was 8/year. The patterns of steroid utilization were generally consistent between the databases (see Table 1), with little variation across database type, gender, or calendar years. However, geriatric claimants (aged >65) in the Quebec-public database had higher rates of steroid use than the other groups. Overall, 58%–73% of patients with a claim for 5-ASA and prednisone have ≥ 2 claims for prednisone. Within this group, at least half the claimants (53%–69%) had >90 days between their first and last prednisone claim, with a median time between the first and last prednisone claim ranging from 103 to 222 days. Some prednisone claimants (∼40%) also had claims for steroid-sparing therapies. After excluding those with any immunosuppressive or biologic claim, the rates of steroid dependence remained largely unchanged. Multiple treatment guidelines define steroid-dependence as: An inability to completely taper steroids within 90 days of initiation, frequent use of steroid courses (>1 course/year), and/or relapse within 3 months of stopping. The 3 measures of steroid utilization used in this analysis approximate that definition, although not without caveats. After excluding those with claims for steroid-sparing therapies, prednisone-claimants had a median of 2–4 prednisone claims per year. They also had a median time between first and last prednisone claim of at least 100 days, and more than 52% had a claim for prednisone >90 days apart. Any of these measures taken individually suggests a prevalence of steroid-dependence despite access to steroid-sparing therapies. The data suggest that >50% of patients on 5-ASA that are prescribed prednisone become steroid-dependent within 1 year. Steroid-sparing therapies appear underused in this group of patients, and show little change despite a shifting treatment paradigm.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».