Perceptions of first line nurse managers managing in a culturally diverse environment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Canada is a culturally diverse society with immigration trends that continue to accentuate the cultural diversity. In health care, staff from diverse cultural backgrounds provide care for equally diverse patient populations. Transcultural care poses several challenges for nurses. Unfortunately, there is growing evidence that the needs of culturally diverse clients are not always met. This has implications for first line nurse managers who are responsible for ensuring a high quality of patient care and a harmonious work environment. There are few studies that examine first line nurse managers managing in a climate of cultural diversity of staff members and patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of first line nurse managers managing in a culturally diverse environment. A descriptive design was used given the limited research on this topic. A purposive sample was selected from each of three hospitals in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia for the purpose of focus groups. Each of these hospitals had staff members from diverse cultural backgrounds serving diverse patient populations. Between six and eight first line nurse managers participated in each of three focus groups. Data were examined using latent content analysis, with segments of data coded into categories from which themes emerged. The findings of the study revealed that managing in a culturally diverse environment is very complex and challenging for first line nurse managers. The challenges of difficulties in communication, differing expectations and behavioural norms, and conflict resolution were areas of major concern for first line nurse managers. Both facilitators and barriers to managing in a culturally diverse environment became apparent. Facilitators included the hospital philosophy and policies, resources and services, matching cultural profiles, and celebrating cultural differences. The absence of any of these facilitators can create a barrier to valuing cultural diversity. Additional barriers included discrimination, lack of knowledge about other cultures, and decreasing financial resources. Finally, it appears that culturally diverse patients may receive a lower standard of care in some instances due to the inability of staff to meet their unique needs. The quality of transcultural care is dependent to some extent on the presence or absence of facilitators and barriers. Implications for nursing practice, research, education, and hospital administration were identified from the findings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».