MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2336645439

A document interoperation framework on the semantic web (difsew)

2011· article· en· W2336645439 sur OpenAlexaff
Yevgen Biletskiy, Girish R. Ranganathan

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueSemantic Web and Ontologies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of New Brunswick
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer scienceInteroperationSemantics (computer science)Information retrievalSemantic WebInformation extractionOntologyWorld Wide WebInteroperability
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Enormous amounts of electronic documents are generated in various domains within various contexts. Although these documents are interpretable by human readers, almost all of them lack explicit semantics which allow software applications to correctly interpret data in the documents. Therefore, it is important to create methods which allow automatically extracting information from and imparting semantics into the electronic documents. The semantics enables meaningful search, querying, transformations and interoperation of information within documents. This is especially important for large information archives which are usually the main parts of large enterprise information systems. The semantic enrichment of these information archives discussed in the present dissertation adopts Semantic Web techniques, such as ontologies, rules, and their reasoning engines, as well as Information Extraction methods, which involve position-based and ontology-based techniques. This allows re-engineering large enterprise information systems into knowledge-based systems where data from documents is automatically processed in a meaningful way. Although the Semantic Web and Information Extraction fields are relatively well developed now, there is a need to develop an integrated framework that can embody appropriate methods to process large document storages. The goals of the present dissertation are: (1) to create the integrated semantic framework for document processing, (2) research and develop components of the framework, and (3) investigate existing and possible applications of the framework. The main objectives of the research behind the dissertation are to investigate: (1) methods which allow automatically extracting information from and imparting semantics into the electronic documents, (2) methods for preprocessing information before performing information extraction, (3) methods to process business rules with semantics for externalization of processing logic, (4) methods to work with multiple domains seamlessly, and (5) an integrated framework that can embody appropriate methods to process large document storages. The semantic framework which integrates domain ontologies, rules, reasoning engine, Information Extraction methods, and application logic for building knowledge-based software systems is the main research outcome presented in the dissertation. The purpose of the domain ontologies is to specify conceptualization of the domain the documents belong to. The ontologies can be built manually, extracted from documents, or re-used. The purpose of rules is to specify business logic used in an enterprise. The business logic can be represented by decision table, production rules, or First-Order Logic. The purpose of Information Extraction methods integrated into the framework is to extract semantics from documents presented in various formats. The reasoning engine can be any existing engine, which can process ontologies and rules represented in an appropriate format. The application logic is responsible for querying the reasoning engine and present the result to the user. Although the framework is integrated, its parts are externalized and independent; so the information extraction from documents, domain ontologies, document processing (business) logic, and semantic reasoning can be created and maintained separately by appropriate specialists in the field. The framework includes semantic processing of externalized data processing logic rules and to some extent externalization of application logic. The creation of external information extraction rules by the knowledge engineer is a cumbersome and time consuming task. To overcome this problem, the framework also includes a rule learning or induction system to semi-automate the generation of information extraction rules from source documents with the help of manual annotations. The present ontology and rule-based framework can be applied to: (1) re-engineering very large enterprise information systems adapting Semantic Web computing techniques and (2) creation of new knowledge-based software systems. The dissertation is article based. It presents a variety of concepts published as individual articles to solve the problems stated above and more. Some of the concepts addressed by the dissertation are: (a) A framework for knowledge-based systems which address the concerns relevant to the problems discussed; (b) Information pre-processing using meta-ontology before performing information extraction to populate the domain ontology; (c) Identification and resolution of conflicts during ontological integration using rules for working with information from different domains; (d) RuleML-based learning object interoperability on the semantic web for representing ontologies using RuleML; (e) Representing user-friendly business rules in a semantic web-based format; (f) Information extraction from syllabi for academic e-advising; (g) Semantic annotation of semi-structured documents. The dissertation uses all the concepts listed above and explains them as a framework consisting of modular features. More detailed information for each of the listed concepts can be found in the respective articles presented in the chapters.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,013
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,067

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0130,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,004
Bibliométrie0,0080,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,004
Communication savante0,0100,017
Science ouverte0,0040,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetSemantic Web and OntologiesTravaux en français237 207