MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2336972126 · doi:10.1130/b31305.1

Magma storage, differentiation, and interaction at Lake City caldera, Colorado, USA

2015· article· en· W2336972126 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Ben Kennedy, John Stix, Ken Hon, C. D. Deering, Sarah E. Gelman

Notice bibliographique

RevueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité du Québec à MontréalNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésLibrary scienceHistoryArchaeologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research Article| May 01, 2016 Magma storage, differentiation, and interaction at Lake City caldera, Colorado, USA Ben Kennedy; Ben Kennedy 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0E8, Canada †Current address: Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand, Ben.kennedy@canterbury.ac.nz. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John Stix; John Stix 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0E8, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Ken Hon; Ken Hon 2Geology Department, University of Hawai`i at Hilo, 200 West Kawili Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4091, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Chad Deering; Chad Deering 3Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, 630 Dow Environmental Sciences, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, Michigan 49931, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Sarah Gelman Sarah Gelman 4Institute for Geochemie und Petrologie, NO E 53.1, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ben Kennedy †Current address: Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand, Ben.kennedy@canterbury.ac.nz. 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0E8, Canada John Stix 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0E8, Canada Ken Hon 2Geology Department, University of Hawai`i at Hilo, 200 West Kawili Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4091, USA Chad Deering 3Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, 630 Dow Environmental Sciences, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, Michigan 49931, USA Sarah Gelman 4Institute for Geochemie und Petrologie, NO E 53.1, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 25 Feb 2015 Revision Received: 02 Sep 2015 Accepted: 09 Nov 2015 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online Issn: 1943-2674 Print Issn: 0016-7606 © 2015 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2016) 128 (5-6): 764–776. https://doi.org/10.1130/B31305.1 Article history Received: 25 Feb 2015 Revision Received: 02 Sep 2015 Accepted: 09 Nov 2015 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Ben Kennedy, John Stix, Ken Hon, Chad Deering, Sarah Gelman; Magma storage, differentiation, and interaction at Lake City caldera, Colorado, USA. GSA Bulletin 2016;; 128 (5-6): 764–776. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B31305.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract Rocks from the 23 Ma Lake City caldera show diverse chemical affinities attesting to a complex magmatic system beneath the caldera. Field and geochemical data from ignimbrites and intrusions constrain magma storage and magma interactions during the formation of the caldera. Two geochemically distinct magma batches erupted during caldera formation: batch A, consisting of rhyolites and trachytes, and batch B, consisting of dacites and trachyandesites. The ignimbrites of the Lower, Middle, and Upper Sunshine Peak Tuff represent the bulk of erupted batch A magma, with an increasing proportion of trachyte to rhyolite as the eruption progressed. Overall, the observed trends of major and trace elements are consistent with the sequential eruption of a magmatic system with a rhyolitic upper portion and trachytic lower portion. The Middle Sunshine Peak Tuff contains two distinct types of pumice clast, while the Upper Sunshine Peak Tuff contains four distinct pumice clast types, with one type chemically related to batch B magma. The link between the rhyolite and trachyte of batch A is supported by major- and trace-element geochemical modeling of an initially trachytic magma that fractionated and was subjected to crystal/melt segregation following 50%–60% crystallization. Compositional gaps and chemical heterogeneity in the bulk ignimbrite composition show that the proportions of these different magma types varied significantly during eruption. We propose that the fractionating batch A and B magmas formed distinct magma pods, some containing residual magma mush, that were tapped during different phases of caldera formation. After collapse, dacite lavas of batch B were erupted concurrent with resurgent uplift from shallow intrusion of both residual mingled batch A and batch B magma. In summary, our observations suggest (1) a complex magma chamber geometry from two fractionating magma batches, and (2) magma replenishment and accelerated periods of magma reorganization in the shallow magma plumbing system during a single caldera cycle at Lake City. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,122
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,954

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0470,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,189 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations19
Publié2015
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGeological Society of America BulletinMême sujetGeological and Geochemical AnalysisTravaux en français237 207