MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2337039431 · doi:10.1177/1715163515589924

Pharmacy practice: At the tipping point?

2015· article· en· W2337039431 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ross T. Tsuyuki

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTipping point (physics)Norm (philosophy)PharmacistPharmacyLeagueMedicinePsychologyLawPolitical scienceNursingEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Earlier this spring, i had the chance to go fishing on the West Coast with Norm Campbell (you know Norm—he’s a general internist and professor from the University of Calgary, the creator of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program, president of the World Hypertension League and member of the Order of Canada . . . yes, that Norm). After about 8 hours on my brother’s boat catching no fish at all (but enjoying being outdoors), Norm said to me, “You must be so excited. Pharmacists are at the tipping point of making the transition from dispensers of drugs to carers of patients. You have such good evidence for the impact of pharmacist care on patient outcomes.” At first I started to argue with him. Then, sensing that I was losing, I thought, “Maybe he’s right. Perhaps we are at the tipping point.” In his book, The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, Malcolm Gladwell describes the tipping point as “that magic moment when an idea, trend, or social behavior crosses a threshold, tips, and spreads like wildfire.”1 Or, to use a term we are more familiar with, “starts an epidemic.” So, are we at the tipping point where patient-centred care has infected us all? In an unscientific poll, I asked a number of pharmacists that question. Their answers were affirmative. Let’s look at why we are at the tipping point: The prodigious evidence base for pharmacist care in many disease areas: You have seen the evidence published here in CPJ and other places. For example, look at the hypertension evidence—it’s very compelling.2 Pharmacist uptake: Pharmacists who have made the change have certainly tipped—they cannot conceive of going back to a drug distribution‒only role. Their patients wouldn’t allow it anyway. “Everyone I talk to says they do “patient-centred care, and that’s exciting. It’s spreading like wildfire. [Now] no one’s avoiding it completely,” says Darcy Milford (Turtle Mountain Pharmacy, Blairmore, AB). “I love what my world has become . . . my outcomes are superior to anything that I could have envisioned a few years ago,” says Lonni Johnson (Winter’s Pharmacy, Drayton Valley, AB). “I’ve seen firsthand the impact that we can have on our patients’ lives and that of their families,” says Janelle Fox (Pharmasave, Bonnyville, AB). Payer recognition and payment: Payers are recognizing and paying for pharmacist care. Janelle Fox remarks that “other health care professionals and government payers/decision makers see the benefit of our impact.” “This wildfire recognition has not stopped within our borders, but we are seeing several countries in Europe, Asia and Australia starting to empower their pharmacists,” notes Murtaza Hassanali (Shoppers Drug Mart, Edmonton, AB). Patient expectation of pharmacist care: “Patients now expect it,” says Rick Siemens (London Drugs, Lethbridge, AB). Has society also reached the tipping point? If you’re not convinced, look at it this way. Think back 5 to 7 years. Would you have ever thought that pharmacists would be vaccinating? Prescribing? Managing ambulatory conditions? And getting paid for it? Janelle Fox says, “I look at how much the profession has changed and grown since [my] graduation in 2006 and even I’m amazed!” That’s a lot of change in a short period of time. Bigger changes than in the last 50 years in the profession. But there are still challenges. Some of the many issues that need to be addressed: Financial viability of patient-centred care: Clearly, with reductions in dispensing fees and the time it takes to provide patient care, the business model for pharmacy has changed. But it needs to remain financially viable. Payment to individual pharmacists: Why can’t pharmacists be paid directly for their care, rather than payments to a pharmacy (which never share those profits with the pharmacists who provide the care)? “We have failed ourselves by not differentiating between a pharmacy and a pharmacist,” says Murtaza Hassanali. Pharmacist fears: “Fears of responsibility, physicians, audits, paperwork, insurance companies, losing jobs,” notes Darcey Milford. Pharmacists need to overcome their fears. Evidence: “We need to continue to build the evidence for pharmacist care and outcomes” (Dean Carlo Marra, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL). Evidence is the “high road” to change. Perhaps I am manipulating Norm by only allowing him to meet certain pharmacists and by only telling him the good stuff about pharmacists. Or perhaps he’s seeing this from outside the profession, as a physician with a public health and global health perspective? Maybe he is right. . . . Let’s start an epidemic! ■

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,013
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,087
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,046
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,154

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0130,087
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,008
Communication savante0,0180,025
Science ouverte0,0020,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0220,027
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0460,013

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,188
Tête enseignante GPT0,393
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du CanadaMême sujetPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesTravaux en français237 207