MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2338599565 · doi:10.4103/2347-5625.178164

Vision of Professional Development of Oncology Nursing in the World

2016· editorial· en· W2338599565 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stella Aguinaga Bialous

Notice bibliographique

RevueAsia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · 2016
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineWorkforceHealth careNoticeCancerGlobal healthBreast cancerEconomic growthPolitical scienceNursingPublic health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I was asked to share my vision for a worldwide nursing workforce prepared to address cancer care across the continuum, from prevention to palliative care. The majority of cancer cases are in high-income countries such as Australia, Canada, USA, and countries of Western Europe.1WHO GLOBOCAN International Agency for Research on Cancer Globocan.Available at http://globocaniarcfr/DefaultaspxDate: 2012Google Scholar However, when looking at the distribution of cancer-related mortality, it is clear that these high-income countries are also where a person diagnosed with cancer has the best chance of survive, with mortality disproportionately occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). When considering trends, and quantifying the burden of cancer from mortality and morbidity through disability-adjusted life year (DALY), it is alarming to notice that the rates of cancer-related DALYs increased significantly, in some cases more than doubled, in LMIC, particularly the African continent and South-East Asia and Pacific island countries from 1990 to 2010. This increase has been demonstrated in different types of cancers such as leukemia, cervical, breast, and lung cancer.2The Council of Foreign Relations The Emerging Crisis: Noncommunicable Diseases.Available at http://wwwcfrorg/diseases-noncommunicable/emerging-global-health-crisis/p33883Date: 2014Google Scholar Consequently, there is a growing need for cancer care in LMIC, and health systems, globally, are trying to adjust to these changing needs. Regardless of region or country, nurses are the backbone of the healthcare system, but need to be properly prepared to address the growing care needs of individuals at risk or diagnosed with cancer. The question remains on how are we, nurses, going to be ready in the short, medium, and long-term to respond? The number of nurses is not evenly distributed globally. Most nurses are in Europe and America, with the caveat that 59% of the nurses in the American region are on only two countries: Canada and the USA. This leads us to a severe shortage, particularly in LMIC. A related challenge in meeting the educational needs of nurses, globally, is a changing definition of "oncology" nursing. That would help define who is our target audience. Although the exact numbers are not known, the majority of persons diagnosed with cancer do not receive care in specialized cancer centers.3The Cancer Atlas 2014; American Cancer Society, International Agency for Research on Cancer & Union for International Cancer Control.Available at http://canceratlascancerorgGoogle Scholar Furthermore, the important care related to prevention and screening is often performed by nurses who may not traditionally identify themselves as oncology nurses, but rather as public health nurses, maternal-child health nurses, midwives, and palliative care nurses. Thus, if nurses truly are to be prepared to care for patients across the continuum, cancer nursing education needs to be intertwined within all stages of nursing education. Nursing education must be "based on standardized, evidence-based curricula, adapted to meet each country′s needs, and based on lifelong learning" (Joint statement on World Cancer Day 2015, http://www.isncc.org/?page=WCD2015). What we do know is that a better-educated nursing workforce leads to better patient outcomes,4Cheung RB, Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM. Nursing care and patient outcomes: international evidence. Enferm Clin 35–40.Google Scholar which has been confirmed by nursing-lead research in cancer care.5World Health Organization Enhancing nursing and midwifery capacity to contribute to the prevention, treatment, and management of noncommunicable diseases. Human Resources for Health Observer - Issue No 12. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2012Available at: http://wwwwhoint/hrh/resources/observer12/en/indexhtmlGoogle Scholar Thus, there should no longer be a debate that is cancer care education should be part of basic or specialized, but it needs to be both basic and specialized, with the added benefits of advanced practice nursing in cancer care where feasible and available. A good place to start is addressing barriers to incorporating cancer-related education into already full nursing curricula. However, nursing educators need to remember that not including a leading cause of suffering, disease and death is no longer an option. Table 1includes some examples of barriers and suggestions on how these can be addressed.6Sarna L, Bialous SA, Rice VH, Wewers ME. Promoting tobacco dependence treatment in nursing education. Drug Alcohol Rev 507–16.Google ScholarTable 1:Examples of barriers for including cancer content in nursing curriculum and suggested measures to address these barriersBarrierSuggested measuresLimited preparation of educatorsContinuing educational, train-the-trainer workshops, on-line programs, and resourcesLack of curricular supportDesignate a faculty championNot a curriculum priorityAdvocate for explicit contentStudent assignmentsInclude as an option, require risk factors to be included in all clinical write upsLack of cancer-related content in prelicensure and advanced examinationsPolicies to ensure that competency as an outcome of basic and advanced educationLimited expectation in the health-care delivery systemInstitutionalize in nursing documentation, collaborate with other health-care providers Open table in a new tab Table 2provides some specific ideas on the areas of existing basic nursing curriculum that could be expanded to ensure that cancer-related content is included.6Sarna L, Bialous SA, Rice VH, Wewers ME. Promoting tobacco dependence treatment in nursing education. Drug Alcohol Rev 507–16.Google ScholarTable 2:Example of existing areas in basic nursing curriculum that could be expanded to include cancer-related contentCurriculum areaSpecific topicHealth promotion, follow-up in specialty courses (e.g., maternity)Risk factors, screening, and preventionAll clinical coursesEvidence-based practice, opportunity for clinical experiencePharmacology, medical–surgical, and specialty courses (e.g., mental health)Treatment, immunization, and behavioral interventionsMedical–surgical, maternal health and specialty courses, health-care systems, nursing and midwifery issues coursesGuidelines implementation, best practices, and system changes Open table in a new tab In addition, there is a need to address the educational needs of nurses who are currently in practice through continuing education. Professional organizations, such as ISNCC, and healthcare systems have been developing a range of strategies to meet these educational needs. Stronger partnerships between professional societies and health system would strengthen these education initiatives. Distance learning, where feasible, should be encouraged. There is a myth that distance learning is only possible in high-income countries, but with new mobile technologies developing at a fast pace, nursing needs to explore all opportunities to facilitate nurses′ access to continuing education. It is pivotal, however, that continuing education initiatives are coupled with evaluation strategies to ensure changes in nursing practice that improve cancer care. These new technologies could be coupled with more traditional methods such as seminars and workshops, but it is fundamental that educational initiatives target "nontraditional" oncology nurses, i.e., nurses in community settings, primary care clinics, general hospitals, and palliative care facilities. ISNCC has a series of resources for continuing education in several languages and topics available at www.isncc.org. Galassi et al.7Galassi A, Challinor J, Key Stakeholder Group on Oncology Nursing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Strengthening the oncology nurse workforce in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Oncol 887–8.Google Scholar outlined ISNCC′s vision for strengthening the oncology nurse workforce in LMIC via education, including the need for broader collaboration among all stakeholders, and the need to ensure that educational programs are sustainable through engagement with policymakers inside and outside the nursing profession. There are multiple opportunities for nursing within the global political context. Addressing the burden of cancer has been inserted as within the United Nations′ noncommunicable diseases (NCD) targets, providing a platform to engage with policy makers on the needs of oncology nursing education. Furthermore, the NCD targets were inserted as part of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, thus intrinsically linking cancer care and control with the global development agenda. These macro policy developments offer nurses′ opportunities to demonstrate leadership in addressing cancer care needs and reaching targets through education, policy, practice, and research. As the largest group of healthcare professionals, nurses should not only have a seta of the table, but also they should be well positioned to lead the discussions. That is my vision for professional development of oncology nurses. This article was written on the basis of a presentation given at the AONS 2015 conference held in Seoul Korea by the Asian Oncology Nursing Society. Nil. There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,313
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,071
Tête enseignante GPT0,493
Écart entre enseignants0,422 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAsia-Pacific Journal of Oncology NursingMême sujetPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesTravaux en français237 207