Geochemistry of magnetite and the genesis of magnetite-apatite lodes in the iron mask batholith, British Columbia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Magnetite-apatite lodes, in the Upper Triassic Iron Mask batholith, south-central British Columbia, are tabular bodies up to 200 m long and 6 m wide which consist of 50 to 90 percent magnetite, 10 to 40 percent apatite and variable amounts of amphibole. Lodes occur in close spatial association with alkaline "porphyry-type" copper mineralization, disseminated-magnetite rich diorite and late syenitic units. To aid in determining the genesis of these lodes 84 samples of lode magnetite and disseminated magnetite from dioritic, syenitic and picritic units of the batholith were analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry for: chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, magnesium, manganese, nickel, titanium, vanadium and zinc, fourteen samples were also analyzed for major and minor oxides by electron microprobe. Minor element data indicates a magmatic-injection origin for the lodes; magnetite being concentrated by immiscibility between magnetite-apatite and an alkalic magma. With the exception of copper and lead, minor element variations in magnetite due to sampling error and analytical variations are insignificant relative to between and within rock unit variations, as revealed by analysis of variance. Disseminated magnetite from picrite has high and distinctive contents of chromium, magnesium, nickel and zinc relative to disseminated magnetite in syenite and diorite. Minor element concentrations in disseminated magnetite from syenite and diorite are very similar statistically. Lode magnetite, compared to disseminated magnetite from diorite and syenite, is markedly lower in chromium and less so in titanium and vanadium, however other elements occur in statistically similar concentrations.. Minor element concentrations in magnetite from Iron Mask lodes are statistically the same as those in magnetite from magmatic iron deposits in Kiruna, Sweden and Missouri, U.S.A. Magnetite from hydrothermal vein and metasomatic deposits has lower chromium and nickel contents than Iron Mask lode magnetite. Geochemical evidence presented here suggests that Iron Mask lodes are: 1) genetically related to the Cherry Creek syenite and Pothook diorite units of the Iron Mask batholith, and 2) magmatically emplaced based on analogy to Kiruna and Missouri ores. Experimental documentation of immiscibility between a magnetite-apatite melt and a silicate magma allows a model to be developed that describes the genesis of the Iron Mask batholith. and associated magnetite-apatite lodes. Crystal settling of plagioclase and pyroxene from the Iron Mask magma fromed the early. Pothook diorite and enriched the residual magma in iron and alkaliis. The magma also differentiated toward the experimentally determined magnetite-apatite eutectic composition-(i.e. 20 to 35 weight percent apatite in total magnetite plus apatite). When the eutectic was reached after crystallization of Pothgok diorite, (just before the Cherry Creek syenite started to crystallize) magnetite and apatite separated together from the silicate magma as an immiscible melt, and settled to the base of the magma chamber. The magnetite-apatite melt was injected into fractures to form lodes after the surrounding Cherry Creek magma had largely crystallized. Explosive emplacement of Cherry Creek breccias and associated copper mineralization resulted from a~vapor bubble formed in the final stages of. Cherry Greek syenite crystallization. The model presented shows that magnetite-apatite lodes in the Iron Mask batholith are magmatic-injection in origin. Their genesis, as well as associated porphyry-type copper mineralization, is an integral part of a differentiating alkalic intrusion.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».