Creation and Adaptation of Norms in a Tire-Mold Manufacturing Organization
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This case study examined the ways in which organizational members created norms that sustained the organizational culture in a tire-mold manufacturing organization, the effects of those norms, and members' motivation to comply with them.Within the organization, cocultures maintain identical values but employ different norms due to the nature of their work.Despite the standardized processes for designing and manufacturing tire-molds, norms that sustain the values of autonomy and creativity enable innovation that competition demands.This kind of study adds to organizational communication research about norms and can benefit organizational leaders, researchers, and consultants when assessing cultural values to determine strategies for change.The tire industry is competitive and requires change in products, procedures, and communication.Because the values and norms are imbedded in the culture, any such changes must address these strongholds.This case study can be used as a comparison to other organizations in a competitive environment.To conduct an assessment of the culture and its norms, the researcher audio taped face-to-face interviews with 30 members of a tire-mold manufacturing organization in a small Midwest town and observed organizational members over a period of three days.The tapes were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Grounded Theory (Glaser and Strauss, 1967;Strauss and Corbin, 1998).Themes that emerged revealed the cultural values and the norms that sustain them.The strength of this case study lies in its ability to identify cultural elements attributed to the norms.However, the restricted time spent in the organization limited the amount of contact with organizational members who were administrators; thus, findings would be richer and more conclusive with additional time.iv DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my soul-mate and rock, Gene, whose love and support sustained me through this journey and who celebrated each milestone as a significant event of personal, relational, and professional growth.v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the many people who helped and encouraged me throughout this project.I attribute my sense of self and the success of this project to my community of supporters.First, I would like to thank my advisor and mentor, Dr. Lynda Dee Dixon, whose belief in me spurred greater things than I had ever dreamed possible.Her mentoring extended beyond the normal duties of an advisor or instructor.Even as I completed the final edits to this document, a few weeks after a major surgery, with her arm in a sling, she phoned to offer more feedback after an evening class.Her mentoring inspired my interest in Health Communication and created an acute awareness and appreciation of the challenges caregivers of loved ones with Alzheimer's face.I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Radhika Gajjala, whose expertise in cultural communication and CMC enabled me to consider possibilities for using unconventional channels to initiate and maintain relationships; Dr. John Makay whose knowledge of rhetoric and organizational communication helped me critique and understand organizational members; and Dr. Gregory Garske, whose mentoring in the Career Counseling class helped me understand the value of job satisfaction and its relationship to a positive work environment.I would also like to thank Dr. Dennis Hale for the endless supply of research questions he helped me consider in his classes and when he offered advice on this project.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».