Sadyaq Balae! L'autochtonie formosane dans tous ses etats (Sadyaq Balae! Formosan indigeneity in all its states) [Book Review]
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Scott Simon, Sadyaq Balae! L'autochtonie formosane dans tous ses etats (Sadyaq Balae! Formosan indigeneity in all its states), Quebec, Presses de l'Universite Laval, Collection Mondes Autochtones, 2012, 252 pp. + XV.As book's back cover blurb notes, few ethnographic works in Western languages deal with Formosan indigeneity. This book is only one in French devoted exclusively to issue. Scott Simon draws on rich, finely analysed ethnography of Sadyaq Austronesian societies, especially in last five of book's eight chapters. He adds to and carries on from previous contributions - articles and book chapters on subject by Fiorella Allio, Veronique Arnaud, Josiane Cauquelin, and Chantal Zheng, to cite just main authors in French on identity dynamics among Taiwan's Austronesian peoples (who represent 2% of archipelago's 23 million inhabitants).In 2004, Josiane Cauquelin published monograph in English entitled From Headhunting to Modern World on another of Taiwan's Austronesian societies, Puyuma, and transformations it underwent under influence of successive policies of Japanese government and Republic of China regime. (1) In this book, Josiane Cauquelin stresses rituality as well as kinship and organisation among Puyuma, but offers no more than about ten pages on their constitution as an ethnic group and on their relations with state apparatus controlled by Han majority with whom they live today in same villages.It is just reverse in Sadyaq Balae: whereas in general classic monograph deals with kinship relations and rituality, this book covers them more succinctly in latter part of Chapter 2 (pp. 47-62), to be referred to briefly as and when argumentation requires it, thus making for an easier flow. A brief first chapter goes over and economic conditions of indigenous peoples and their place in Taiwan's lively identity debate as well as in contextualisation of research itself. Although directed at author's students (p. 1), and thus taking didactic approach, it is not textbook. It does demand effort on reader's part, containing throughout many vernacular terms, proper names, and place names.The book's general structure is justified by author's choice of clearly situating his subject, indigeneity, in field of political anthropology. More specifically, it follows path hewn by mainly French anthropologists such as Marc Abeles, Georges Balandier, Maurice Godelier, Jean-Pierre Olivier de Sardan, and Pierre Clastres. In line with last named, Scott Simon qualifies Sadyaq as an egalitarian (division of tasks between sexes is seen as complementary rather than unequal), without political institutions, and as society against (2) notion he defines as social logic according to which several societies refuse any accumulation of power (p. XI) and reject the emergence of unifying state, stratification, and subordination (p. 4). The book's main problematic is understanding relations between Sadyaq [...] and state during successive administrations of Japanese (1895-1945) and Republic of China (post-1945), and why Sadyaq accepted Taiwanese state's legitimacy on their territory, only to remain marginalised inside country (p. 3).The author's approach is itself political in sense that he uses nonhegemonic anthropology, i.e., rejecting all forms of domination. The choice of re-transcription of vernacular terms is in line with practice of symmetrical anthropology between observer and his interlocutors, same as in all that concerns terminologies, given author's systematic desire to justify his options and define concepts. He stresses that indigeneity forms part of relationship between community and state or between an individual and noting helpfully that it is just a legal classification (p. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».