MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2340385073 · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1408

Managing chronic pain in children and adolescents

2003· editorial· en· W2340385073 sur OpenAlexaff
Christopher Eccleston

Notice bibliographique

RevueBMJ · 2003
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePediatric Pain Management Techniques
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChronic painMedicinePsychologyPhysical therapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Recent epidemiological data have made nonsense of the prejudice that chronic pain is a uniquely adult problem. Chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents is now known to have a point prevalence of at least 15%.1 Girls report more pain than boys, and the incidence peaks at an average age of 14 years. The most common complaint is headache, followed by recurrent abdominal pain and musculoskeletal pain.2 Many of the children and adolescents with chronic and recurrent pain will be managed effectively by the family doctor or may simply never come to professional attention. However, a noteworthy number of children and their families are severely affected by pain. Doctors concerned about missing a serious underlying disease invest time and energy in investigating the child and referring to specialists for further evaluation. During the time spent in this “diagnostic vacuum,“ the child often receives little appropriate pain management. If, as is usually the case, no specific cause can be found the child, family, and doctor often become frustrated, sometimes antagonistic towards each other, and the management of the pain goes wanting. It is this time spent in the search for meaning and cure that is thought to be crucial to how the patient and family adjust to pain. Fear and frustration are often fuelled by unhelpful or inaccurate diagnoses such as “functional“ or “psychosomatic“ pain. Families often interpret these labels as blaming them for the child's pain, and the labels tend to reinforce their need to move from doctor to doctor in search of a different diagnosis and cure. The path to chronicity of pain is characterised by failed attempts to adjust and cope with an uncontrollable, frightening, and adverse experience. Over time it is the weight of this experience that leads the patient to develop concomitant symptoms of chronic physical disability, anxiety, sleep disturbance, school absence, and social withdrawal.3,4 Parents report severe parenting stress and dysfunctional family roles. The malignant effects of chronic pain in children are multifactorial and relatively unyielding without treatment. Despite the impact of chronic pain in children and adolescents there is a paucity of evidence to guide clinical practice in this complex area. Pharmacological treatments are used, based usually on data extrapolated from adults. The evidence for effectiveness is limited. In children with migraine there is some evidence for the value of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and sumatriptan nasal spray in acute attacks.5,6 A systematic review of treatment in recurrent abdominal pain found some evidence for the efficacy of famotidine, pizotifen, and peppermint oil enteric coated capsules.7 For children with localised idiopathic pain syndromes such as complex regional pain syndrome (type 1) or with diffuse idiopathic pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia a wide number of drugs including tricyclic antidepressants and anticonvulsants have been used, but there are no controlled studies showing benefit for any of these. Controlled trials with a focus on safety as well as efficacy are urgently needed for all conditions of childhood and adolescence that are characterised by chronic or recurrent pain. Progress has been made on psychologically based treatments. A recent Cochrane systematic review identified 18 randomised controlled trials, of which 13 (12 trials of headache and one on the management of abdominal pain in children) provided data suitable for meta-analysis.8 The main finding of this review was that the number of patients needing to be treated to show benefit for psychological therapies producing more than 50% pain relief compared with control treatments was 2.32. This compares favourably with numbers needed to treat for other published treatments in chronic pain.9 A striking finding is the evidence that psychological therapy for headache can be delivered with good effect at low cost, in community settings, and by trained non-psychologists. Unfortunately these trials reported only analysable data for pain relief. It remains unclear whether these treatments are also effective for other outcomes, such as disability and family or school functioning. An important caveat is that these studies addressed only a population of young people who were not severely disabled by pain. Whether these findings can be generalised to a more disabled group of patients is unknown. Effective approaches to managing the most severely affected individuals remain relatively unresearched. It is not clear which of the many factors that modulate chronic pain should be the focus of treatment strategies. Candidate related factors are temperament, parenting style, individual and familial coping strategies, previous pain experiences, fitness and activity levels, and socioeconomic environment. What is becoming clear, however, is that a child with chronic pain who does not respond to simple first line treatment requires the input of an interdisciplinary team of therapists trained in the management of pain. In a recent evaluation of an intensive interdisciplinary programme of cognitive behaviour therapy in adolescents with chronic pain, improvement was reported on physical, psychological, and social indices, with a return to full time school in 40%.10 A striking feature of this study was the severity of pain in the population served. The average duration of pain in the sample, for example, was 4 years. Chronic pain in children is an important problem. For some conditions such as headache the success of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies is remarkable. Even for children and adolescents with the most severe pain and disability early evidence shows that it may be possible to reduce the impact of pain on the lives of the patients and their families. More action is necessary. Firstly, more paediatric centres are needed, to develop chronic pain programmes. Secondly, we must address the embarrassing lack of data. Collaboration between centres will be necessary to provide large enough samples of patients with the various pain conditions. Finally, we must remain mindful that the incidence of chronic pain in children and adolescents is similar to that of adults but that our knowledge of how to help children cope with chronic pain is underdeveloped. Given the probability that many children with untreated chronic pain will grow into adults disabled by chronic pain, this lack of knowledge potentially has a high societal cost.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,045
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations148
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBMJMême sujetPediatric Pain Management TechniquesTravaux en français237 207