Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Harvey Franklin, VUW Emeritus Geography Professor was born in Birmingham (1928) and died in Wellington in 2015, aged 87. He arrived in 1951 (aged 23) and retired in 1993 (Dominion Post, 2015). In 1995, Franklin's research on European peasantry and social and economic development of New Zealand had been recognised in his election as a fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand, and the Award of a Doctor of Literature. As well as substantial contributions to the geographical literature Harvey made important interventions relevant to the sociology of New Zealand society, even though this is not apparent from the pages of New Zealand Sociology where his books failed to even generate a review. Nonetheless, as David Pearson, for example, recalls, his work was acknowledged in several sociological studies of urban and social change (see, for example, Pearson, 1980; Spoonley et al, 1994) and he took full part in interdisciplinary social science discussions at Victoria during his career.Under Keith Buchanan and Harvey Franklin, VUW geography was explicitly separate in its orientation from other mainstream New Zealand departments which were particularly concerned with man-environment relations, spatial patterns and regions. Eschewing - but supportive of - physical geography (despite the historical importance of Cotton) VUW geography was resolutely socio-economic (Franklin & Winchester, 1993).Franklin's earlier work focused on community. Two long essays (based on research work in the 1950s) focusing on interpreting the various community structures comprise his contributions to Forster's book of readings (Social Process in New Zealand, 1969). He endeavoured to fashion analytical tools to more succinctly describe and illuminatingly explain as he makes explicit in a postscript to one of those essays.My intention in writing this paper in 1957 (see Franklin, 1958) was to establish the community as a meaningful framework within which New Zealand society might be analysed. Later in the Village and the Bush I sought to demonstrate how this could be done - at least for one of the smaller and less complex types of community. By the use of age structures I sought to identify the major communities, arguing that a significantly different age structure was evidence of a significantly different type of community. ..Age structures reflect the social and economic forces at work within a community, and so long as they remain substantially unaltered the demographic features ought to reflect this continuity (p. 73).[And summing up] Although I still believe it would be valid to apply the concept of the dairying and sheep-farming community, and the concept of the provincial city and especially the borough community to the analysis of contemporary New Zealand society... yet applied to the metropolitan area the limitation of the concept are severe (p. 74).Later he turned his attention to the broader structure of the New Zealand economy and society. His magnum opus Trade Growth and Anxiety provided a societal analysis, which might be compared to Porter's Vertical Mosaic on Canada or Dahrendorf's examination of Society and Democracy in Germany, and filled a major void in New Zealand social science. The book is particularly concerned with the lag in New Zealand's adaption to a changing world economy (and geopolitics) given its built-in inertia of a comforting (but, in Franklin's view, an unsustainable) welfare state. The book analyses the structure of the economy, the welfare state but also the regions and suburbs. His prescient anxiety concerns the widening inequalities and social disorganisation (e.g. crime) accumulating in New Zealand cities as the overall structure of the political economy flexes. Again, analytical tools are developed - in this case out of the inter-industry matrices which he simplifies into a model of 4 broad sectors. Several other systems diagrams are developed. Sorokin's typology of different types of culture is drawn on, and Janowitz's sociology of the welfare state, while he gently distances himself from Marxian analyses. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,045 | 0,022 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».