O3‐09‐04: Network‐level analysis of PET metabolic features for detection of Alzheimer's disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
FDG-PET scans offer a powerful window into the metabolic activity in the brain, enabling the characterization of disrupted metabolic patterns in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Regional decrease in metabolic activity has been shown to be a sensitive signature of dementias [1]. Network-level imaging biomarkers derived from structural MRI exhibit potential for individual diganosis of AD [2,3]. Although regional analysis of metabolic features has been studied extensively, the inter-regional metabolic co-variation has not yet been analyzed and used in designing classifiers for incipient AD. We present here a novel study into the group differences in network properties, as well as demonstrate their predictive utility in the detection of prodromal AD. FDG-PET scans were obtained from ADNI-1 dataset for 55 normal controls (NC) and 89 AD subjects at baseline and for 69 progressive MCI (pMCI) subjects (1 year prior to conversion to AD). Raw PET measures were first corrected for partial volume effect (PVE) and then normalized by the mean uptake value of brainstem [1]. They were co-registered to the corresponding T1-MRI scans, and mean uptake values were summarized in patch-wise averages [2]. Based on patch-wise mean uptake values, a GRADIENT network [3] was constructed when the inter-patch difference is greater than a predefined threshold. Network properties (nodal degree, betweenness-centrality etc) were computed from this graph (denoted as PetNet features) to represent the individual subject. They were fused via multiple kernel learning to build a predictive model. The group differences in PetNet features (Figures 1 and 2) reveal an interesting pattern between NC and AD on a group-level, with changes seen in medial temporal lobar structures and few anterior locations. Using RHsT cross-validation [2], we evaluate the classification performance of PetNet features (Figure 3). This approach resulted in an area under ROC (AUC) of 0.92 in discriminating AD from NC, and AUC of 0.85 in discriminating pMCI from NC, which compare favorably to those from structural GRADIENT features [3]. Group Differences between NC and AD in the nodal degree property of PetNet networks. This reveals lowered nodal-degree in AD as compared to NC, with changes in medial temporal lobar structures as well as some anterior brain locations. Group mean Differences between NC and AD in the betweenness centrality property of PetNet networks. These reveal increased betweenness-centrality pattern in AD in the medial temporal lobar structures. Classification results from MKL classifier based on PetNet features. We present novel network-level features summarizing the covariation of metabolism in the brain derived from FDG-PET images. We demonstrate the diagnostic utility of PetNet features for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».