Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study attempts to determine what use the term "integration" has in educational discourse, specifically as it appears in the popular phrase in Christian higher education, "the integration of faith and learning." Chapter I records that many educators see widespread disintegration in contemporary education. This perceived disintegration has led to many calls and proposals for educational integration. While educators perceive this increased need for integration, what "integration" means is less and less clear. By surveying actual usage in educational writing, this thesis distinguishes four general senses of "integration": fusion, incorporation, correlation, and dialogical (in Appendix A and Chapter III). It then explores further typical elements of meaning in educational uses of "integration" (Chapter IV). Chapters III and IV reveal and discuss a number of points of contention between educators as to the "meaning of integration." Chapter V identifies five main sources of the confusion that often accompanies uses of "integration." It is a positive term and frequently is employed primarily for its value as a slogan. Different educators give "integration" at least three different psychological meanings. The same word is used to denote both processes and end states. It is a polymorphous term whose meaning is not clear until what is being integrated is specified. It is a terra that invites conception-building, though conceptions are rarely announced as such; usually educators' visions of what ought to be come cloaked as definitions of terms. "The integration of faith and learning" suffers from every weakness that "integration" itself encounters. Its popularity in certain sectors of church education is understandable when considered in its historical context: some branches of the church that once largely abandoned higher education are now trying to express a new interest in it. "Integration" is a choice word to serve as a slogan that expresses a certain conception of Christian education. Beyond its function as a slogan, and despite the other problems that frequently accompany its use, "integration" does have use in education, partly because integration is an important concept in education.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».