MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2343592663 · doi:10.14288/1.0096748

The reproductive cycle of the river otter, Lutra canadensis, in the marine environment of southwestern British Columbia

2010· article· en· W2343592663 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Garry B. Stenson

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueEcology and biodiversity studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLutraOtterFisheryGeographyBeluga WhaleEcologyBiologyArctic

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Knowledge of reproduction in the river otter, Lutra canadensis, and of the factors which control the reproductive cycle, is limited. The reproductive biology of river otters in the marine environment of British Columbia, and some of the factors which may influence their reproductive cycle, in particular, the effect of photoperiod, were examined. The changes that occurred in the anatomy, histology and endocrinology of the annual reproductive cycle were determined in wild (226 male, 146 female) and captive (9 male, 5 female) otters. Reproductive cycles were similar in both groups. As in the fresh-water environment, coastal otters are seasonal breeders with a prolonged, obligatory period of embryonic diapause prior to implantation. Changes were similar to those reported in other mustelids. In males, development of the seminiferous tubules was divided into a series of nine distinct phases used to quantify the degree of reproductive activity present. Testosterone concentrations were highly correlated to changes in testicular activity, and fell into the low end of the range of concentrations seen in mustelids. Vaginal smear types were found to identify correctly the reproductive state of female otters. Estradiol concentrations of captive otters were highly variable, but the values obtained and the pattern of secretion were similar to those of other carnivores. Although estradiol levels of captive otters were reduced in the final two years of the study, normal ovarian development occurred. During pregnancy, progesterone concentrations corresponded to changes observed in luteal cell cytology. I present evidence suggesting that female otters are monestrous, induced ovulators. The timing of reproductive events of otters in the marine environment was similar to those of otters inhabiting fresh water at comparable latitudes. Reproductive activity of males began in the late autumn and adults were capable of breeding from late January through mid-May. Females exhibited estrus from late February through mid-May, with the majority of matings probably occurring during March and April. After a nine to eleven month period of embryonic diapause, implantation occurred the subsequent February. Births occurred after an estimated two month gestation and parturient 1 otters mated during lactation. Male otters were sexually mature at the end of their second year. Only 55% of females bred at age class 2 and sexual maturity was delayed until the following year in the remainder of the females. Pregnancy rates were high among females over 3 years of age and ovulation rates were similar to those of other studies. To determine the influence of photoperiod on the timing of reproductive events, captive otters were exposed to increased photoperiods. With one exception, spermatogenesis and estrus occurred earlier under experimental conditions. My results suggest that the termination of embryonic diapause is also under photoperiodic control. Variations in temperature or food were not associated with changes in reproductive condition. This study suggests that photoperiod probably controls the timing of the reproductive cycle of otters in British Columbia.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,115
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,141
Écart entre enseignants0,137 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2010
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Même sujetEcology and biodiversity studiesTravaux en français237 207