MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2344003070 · doi:10.47678/cjhe.v46i1.187819

Book Review of "Critical Approaches to the Study of Higher Education: A Practical Introduction"

2016· article· en· W2344003070 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Maggie McDonnell

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Higher Education · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHigher Education Governance and Development
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHigher educationMathematics educationEngineering ethicsSociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Martinez-Aleman, Ana M., Prusser, Brian, and Bensimon, Estela Mara (Eds.) (2015). Critical Approaches to the Study of Higher Education: A Practical Introduction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pages: 331. Price: $34.95 USD (paper).Perhaps especially in the field of education, socially conscious critical inquiry is a fundamental facet of research. Our campuses are often a microcosm of our diverse society, and students, faculty, and researchers experience the benefits and the obstacles inherent in a stratified society. Therefore, we strive to recognize privilege and marginalization in our research. While this book presumes to present an introduction to such critical research, it tends to focus almost exclusively on the American higher education system, and issues of race and class within that system.The editors, and several contributors, are involved in work for the Association for the Study of Higher Education's (ASHE) Institutes on Equity and Critical Policy Analysis. The book positions critical research as crucial to a democratic education system, in which critical approaches can help stakeholders in higher education see beyond the normative models and frameworks that have long limited our understanding of students, institutions, organization, governance, and ... policies (p. 4). At the heart of the book is the idea that linking critical theories, models, and methodologies with a self-aware critical vision is essential to social action in higher education.In the opening chapter, Martinez-Aleman provides an overview of critical theory and its relevance to research and policy-making. Obviously, one chapter cannot provide an in-depth survey of the topic, but Martinez-Aleman provides a comprehensive list of suggested readings for deeper delving into the various theories. Her overview begins with Horkheimer's premise that the goal of critical theory is to address the problems that arise from social inequity; by adopting a consciously critical approach, researchers can decenter their perspectives to employ the marginalized critical eye, particularly in terms of race, gender, sexuality, and class. She touches on Habermas, the Frankfurt School, Saussure, and Foucault to provide the foundations for such research, and discusses the ne- cessity of conscious subjectivity in analysing, revising, and creating policies. As do other chapters, this one concludes with a sample study, in which Martinez-Aleman uses critical discourse analysis of a text from the NSSE (National Survey of Student Engagement) to demonstrate the how and why of her proposed method of analysis.Most of the chapters follow a similar pattern: a brief history or context for the critical framework, a discussion of the typical methodologies or approaches, and one or two sample studies to illustrate the theory in application. As one might expect from the context, many of the researchers spend some time on their own practice and positioning; in the second chapter, the author uses personal narrative to explore the tension between emerging perspectives and the established bodies of scholarship, which arises in part from researchers coming from within the marginalized or underrepresented groups struggling with the disconnect between the research that surrounds them and their lived experience. The third chapter examines the dominant power structures in higher education, and how these structures are created and subsequently become deeply ingrained (p. 60) as the natural way to govern academic institutions and education, and includes analysis of public funding models in American higher education as a theory-in-practice illustration of the approach. In a similar vein, the fourth chapter explores the conflict between market-like competition rampant in higher education, particularly in the US, and human capital discourse, which positions investment in education as fundamental to public well-being.The fifth chapter is an excellent overview of the nature and purpose of critical historical inquiry, and provides a useful chronology of the development of critical historical analysis in general, and as applied to education, and is one of the only chapters to even mention queer theory, however briefly. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,091

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0060,006
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0270,015

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,068
Tête enseignante GPT0,368
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Higher EducationMême sujetHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207