Catholic Perspectives on the Church: Towards a Common Vision
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Catherine Clifford introduced this first meeting of the new Interest Group devoted to Catholic responses to the most recent consensus statement of the World Council of Churches' Commission on Faith and Order, The Church: Towards a Common Vision (CTCV).Clifford noted that in 1983 the Board of the CTSA had established a Special Commission tasked to produce a research report on the first convergence text of the commission, Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry (BEM).That commission worked over a three year period under the leadership of Michael A. Fahey, S.J., and produced a careful study of the Lima document in Catholic Perspectives on Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry.The present convergence text is the fruit of a process that began in the wake of the reception of the BEM document when it became apparent to the Faith and Order Commission that much of what prevented the churches from taking further steps towards full communion, even in light of significant agreement on questions of sacramental theology, was rooted in persistent divergence on matters of ecclesiology.From 1993 onward the commission worked to draft a series of consensus texts.The first two versions, The Nature and Purpose of the Church (1998) and later the Nature and Mission of the Church (2005), were qualified as "stages on the way to a common statement" and were circulated widely.In an effort to contribute to that consultation process, an Interest Group was established from 2003 to 2005 at Fahey's initiative, dedicating three years to the study of the 1998 document.A number of these papers were published in Ecumenical Trends.The present Interest Group is conscious of the CTSA's continuing ecumenical responsibility, and aims to promote further study and reception of the work of the Faith and Order Commission by Catholic scholars.Brian Flanagan's paper, "The Church: A Catholic View of a Common Vision" explored the historical development of CTCV with particular attention to its ecclesiological method.He noted that where the previous versions had included materials set aside in distinct "text boxes" -areas of continuing disagreement or requiring further studythe final version has fully integrated a discussion of these matters.Does the inclusion of this material detract from the convergence at the center of concern?Also noteworthy are the many footnotes in the document which draw from the previous work of Faith and Order and from many of the bi-lateral dialogue.This inclusion, Flanagan suggested, gives it the character of a harvesting or receiving text.He welcomed the precision in the use of "communion/koinonia" language.In response to earlier drafts, some had asked whether the term was not being asked to bear more meaning that was possible, or than the biblical witness might permit.Finally, Flanagan observed that CTCV has succeeded in setting the church more firmly in the context of the world, with mission as the driving force of its identity.This approach will surely resonate with the orientations of the Pope Francis' leadership of the Catholic Church in our day.Kristin Colberg spoke of how CTCV serves as an important resource for contemporary dialogue between Catholic and Reformed Churches in America, a conversation which includes representatives of the National Conference of Catholic
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,030 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,023 | 0,027 |
| Communication savante | 0,018 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,021 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,021 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».