The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We developed a reporting guideline to provide authors with guidance about what should be reported when writing a paper for publication in a scientific journal using a particular type of research design: the single-case experimental design. This report describes the methods used to develop the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016. As a result of 2 online surveys and a 2-day meeting of experts, the SCRIBE 2016 checklist was developed, which is a set of 26 items that authors need to address when writing about single-case research. This article complements the more detailed SCRIBE 2016Explanation and Elaboration article (Tate et al., 2016Tate R. Perdices M. Rosenkoetter U. McDonald S. Togher L. Shadish W. for the SCRIBE GroupThe Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration.Archives of Scientific Psychology. 2016; 4: 10-31Crossref Google Scholar) that provides a rationale for each of the items and examples of adequate reporting from the literature. Both these resources will assist authors to prepare reports of single-case research with clarity, completeness, accuracy, and transparency. They will also provide journal reviewers and editors with a practical checklist against which such reports may be critically evaluated. We recommend that the SCRIBE 2016 is used by authors preparing manuscripts describing single-case research for publication, as well as journal reviewers and editors who are evaluating such manuscripts.Scientific AbstractReporting guidelines, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement, improve the reporting of research in the medical literature (Turner et al., 2012Turner L. Shamseer L. Altman D.G. Weeks L. Peters J. Kober T. Moher D. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012; 11: MR000030http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.mr000030.pub2Crossref PubMed Scopus (508) Google Scholar). Many such guidelines exist and the CONSORT Extension to Nonpharmacological Trials (Boutron et al., 2008Boutron I. Moher D. Altman D.G. Schulz K.F. Ravaud P. the CONSORT GroupExtending the CONSORT Statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration.Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008; 148: 295-309http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008Crossref PubMed Scopus (1699) Google Scholar) provides suitable guidance for reporting between groups intervention studies in the behavioral sciences. The CONSORT Extension for N-of-1 Trials (CENT 2015) was developed for multiple crossover trials with single individuals in the medical sciences (Shamseer et al. 2015Shamseer L. Sampson M. Bukutu C. Schmid C.H. Nikles J. Tate R. the CENT GroupCONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: Explanation and elaboration.British Medical Journal. 2015; 350: h1793http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj/h1793Crossref PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar, Vohra et al., 2015Vohra S. Shamseer L. Sampson M. Bukutu C. Schmid C.H. Tate R. the CENT GroupCONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement.British Medical Journal. 2015; 350: h1738http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj/h1738Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar), but there is no reporting guideline in the CONSORT tradition for single-case research used in the behavioral sciences. We developed the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 to meet this need. This Statement article describes the methodology of the development of the SCRIBE 2016, along with the outcome of 2 Delphi surveys and a consensus meeting of experts. We present the resulting 26-item SCRIBE 2016 checklist. The article complements the more detailed SCRIBE 2016 Explanation and Elaboration article (Tate et al., 2016Tate R. Perdices M. Rosenkoetter U. McDonald S. Togher L. Shadish W. for the SCRIBE GroupThe Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration.Archives of Scientific Psychology. 2016; 4: 10-31Crossref Google Scholar) that provides a rationale for each of the items and examples of adequate reporting from the literature. Both these resources will assist authors to prepare reports of single-case research with clarity, completeness, accuracy, and transparency. They will also provide journal reviewers and editors with a practical checklist against which such reports may be critically evaluated.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,067 | 0,066 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle