MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2345360418 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.2516.2516

Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia with t(8;16)(p11;p13): A Distinct Clinical and Biological Entity. Results of a Collaborative Study by the International Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster AML Study Group.

2012· article· en· W2345360418 sur OpenAlexaff
Eva A. Coenen, C. Michel Zwaan, O Haas, Barbara De Moerloose, Marta Jeison, Anne Auvrignon, M. Dworzak, Andrea Pession, John Swansbury, Wong Kf, Kiminori Terui, Süreyya Savaşan, Martin Winstanley, Goda Vaitkevičienė, Rob Pieters, MM van den Heuvel‐Eibrink

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMyeloid leukemiaOncologyLeukemiaInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2516 Introduction: In pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cytogenetic abnormalities are important for prognosis and treatment stratification. Some recurring cytogenetic abnormalities occur so rarely that large collaborative studies are required to define their prognostic impact. t(8;16)(p11;p13) is an aberration reported in <1% of pediatric AML patients. Recently, Haferlach et al. (Leukemia, 2009) reported that t(8;16)(p11;p13) represents a distinct clinical and biological subgroup in adult AML, with dismal clinical outcome (median overall survival (OS) 4.7 months). In pediatric AML case reports are available, but studies of larger series are lacking. Methods: We collected data on patients with t(8;16)(p11;p13) (n=39) from 18 collaborative study groups belonging to the International Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster AML-Committee. Data collection included clinical characteristics, karyotype, morphology and immunophenotype, which were centrally reviewed by the co-authors. In addition, the literature was screened for reports on pediatric t(8;16)(p11;p13), which found an additional 23 cases. Results: A total of 62 pediatric AML patients with t(8;16)(p11;p13) were identified, diagnosed between 1978–2010, including 2 secondary AML cases. They had a median age of 1.2 years (range 0–17 years) and 56% of the patients were younger than 2 years old. Median white blood cell count was 21.3 × 109/l (n= 59, range 1.1–173 × 109/l). FAB type was M4 or M5 in 95% of the cases and immunophenotypes showed monocytic differentiation. Erythrophagocytosis (23/33, 70%), leukemia cutis (21/36, 58%) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC, 15/38, 39%) occurred frequently. At initial diagnosis, 35/57 (61%) of the patients showed t(8;16)(p11;p13) as the sole aberration (5 incomplete karyotypes were excluded). In the remaining 22 patients, no recurrent additional cytogenetic aberrations were found. In patients diagnosed after January 1st1993, and treated with chemotherapy at initial diagnosis (n= 34), the CR rate was 85% (29/34), 5-year OS was 59% (±9%), event free survival (EFS) was 57% (±9%) and the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 28% (±8%). The median follow-up time of survivors was 4 years. Outcome was is comparable to a reference cohort of AML-BFM patients (n= 543) treated in the same era, with OS of 62% (±2%), EFS of 50% (±2%) and CIR of 42% (±2%). Most striking was that in 7 neonates (<1 month of age) diagnosed with AML and t(8;16)(p11;p13), spontaneous complete remission was achieved. Three of these infants survived without recurrence of disease (follow-up 0.9–4.0 years). For those who relapsed (0.7–4 years after initial diagnosis), chemotherapy treatment was successful in 2/4 patients. Gene expression data, using the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 array, were available from 297 pediatric AML samples, of which 8 were t(8;16)(p11;p13). The gene expression signature of t(8;16)(p11;p13) AML clustered close to but distinct from MLL-rearranged AML using unsupervised analysis. Highly expressed genes included HOXA11, HOXA10, RET, PERP and GGA2, indicating a pathway in common with MLL-rearranged AML with distinct features. PERP is a direct target gene of p53 and acts as an effector of apoptosis, GGA2 codes for a protein that regulates protein trafficking within the cell. PERP and GGA2 knockdown in high expressing cell lines did not result in significant changes in cell proliferation or apoptosis, thus their function in leukemic blasts remains unknown. DNA methylation profiling was performed using Agilent 244K Human CpG Island arrays on 167 pediatric AML samples of which 12 had t(8;16)(p11;p13). Differential methylation of the TRIM59 promoter, an oncogene described in prostate cancer located on chromosome 3, was confirmed by pyrosequencing, with subsequent mRNA overexpression, validated by RT-qPCR. Conclusion: This study shows the distinct nature of t(8;16)(p11;p13) pediatric AML with remarkable clinical features such as high percentage of leukemia cutis and DIC. The 5-year OS of this pediatric cohort was intermediate (59%), and therefore different from the dismal prognosis reported in adult cases. In neonatal t(8;16)(p11;p13) AML, spontaneous remissions were reported. Profiling studies have shed light on potential oncogenic mechanisms involved in AML with t(8;16)(p11;p13), including HOX-gene upregulation similar to MLL-rearranged AML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,329
Écart entre enseignants0,301 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207