Procedures for transferring to British Columbia the federal government’s interest in offshore oil and gas
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Provinces of British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Newfoundland are all seeking control over offshore resources, that is the natural resources within the waters beyond their coastlines. Provincial demands have ranged from challenges of the federal government's claim to ownership of these resources to discussions of schemes whereby management of the offshore resources would be shared by the provincial and federal governments. There has not been any conclusive judicial determination of the ownership of offshore natural resources, though the federal government relies on the decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Offshore Minerals Reference, that the resources beyond the ordinary low water mark off British Columbia come within the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the federal government. The applicability of the decision in this Reference, to Newfoundland is being challenged by that Province. The remaining Maritime provinces of Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick, had reached a memorandum of understanding with the federal government on a shared management scheme but a subsequent federal proposal to seek constitutional amendment to transfer ownership of offshore natural resources to the Maritime provinces and British Columbia made the management scheme obsolete since the scheme would have transferred a substantially lesser degree of control. The present federal position is to deal with control over offshore resources through constitutional amendment; as part of a proposed wholesale amendment to the British North America Act, 18 67. This paper examines the necessity for constitutional amendment to deal with the transfer of offshore oil and gas under federal control, to the coastal provinces and in particular to British Columbia. As an alternative to constitutional amendment, this paper examines three procedures, for transferring offshore oil and gas to British Columbia which do not require constitutional amendment. The first procedure examines the possibility of extending the boundaries of the Province of British Columbia, for the limited purpose of including offshore oil and gas within the boundaries of British Columbia thus bringing offshore oil and gas within the legislative jurisdiction of the province. The second procedure examines the possibility of transferring ownership to either the Province of British Columbia or to a petroleum corporation controlled by the Province. The assumption in this second procedure is that a transfer of ownership could give a substantial degree of control to the Province over offshore oil and gas. The final procedure is to adapt the proposed Maritime shared management scheme to enable British Columbia to share with the federal government management of oil and gas development off British Columbia's west coast. It is necessary in assessing the most viable alternative, to examine a shared management scheme even though a discussion of shared management would at first appear to be reverting to an alternative which has been superseded by offers by the federal government to transfer more substantial control.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,018 | 0,043 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,029 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».