Phasing Out of Suspended Sentences - Background Paper
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive background in relation to the use of suspended sentences in Tasmania. It is intended as a companion report to the Phasing out of Suspended Sentences: Consultation Paper that sets out possible replacements for the suspended sentence in Tasmania.This paper aims to provide a comprehensive background in relation to the use of suspended sentences in Tasmania. It addresses the following aspects of the Terms of Reference:1. Examine Tasmania’s current use of suspended sentences of imprisonment for adults and young offenders including: (a) the frequency with which they are used; (b) the offences for which they are used; (c) the length of sentences; (d) breach rates; (e) sentencing practices on breach; and (f) recidivism rates including where reoffending does not result in a breach;2. Examine Tasmania’s current use of other sentencing options including actual terms of imprisonment, community based orders and conditional release orders and the possible effect on them of the abolition of suspended sentences;3. Research legislative approaches to suspended sentencing options in other jurisdictions in Australia and overseas, including an analysis of (and commentary on any published statistics on) suspended sentences and breaches and of the effect of the abolition of suspended sentences on imprisonment numbers.This paper is intended as a companion report to the consultation paper on possible replacements for the suspended sentence in Tasmania.Chapter 2 provides an overview of the current legal framework and examines the use of suspended sentences in Tasmania. It provides a comparison with the law in other Australian jurisdictions, as well as the position in Canada and in England and Wales.Chapter 3 contains the Council’s analysis of Tasmania’s current use of all sentencing options available under the Sentencing Act 1997 (Tas) in the Supreme Court. This includes actual imprisonment, fully and partly suspended sentences, community based orders and conditional release orders. It also sets out data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) in relation to the use of different sentencing options in other jurisdictions to provide a comparison with sentencing practice in Tasmania.Chapter 4 contains the Council’s analysis of Tasmania’s current use of all sentencing options available under the Sentencing Act 1997 (Tas) in the Magistrates Court. It also sets out data from the ABS in relation to the use of different sentencing options in lower courts in other jurisdictions to provide a comparison with sentencing practice in Tasmania.Chapter 5 provides an analysis of the breach of suspended sentences in Tasmania, sentencing practices on breach and recidivism rates including where reoffending does not result in a breach. It also discusses research that has examined breaches of suspended sentences and recidivism rates in other jurisdictions.The companion paper, Phasing Out of Suspended Sentences - Consultation Paper, can be found at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2666393
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,028 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».