Nuclear Export Inhibitor KPT-8602 Is Highly Active Against Leukemic Blasts and Leukemia-Initiating Cells in Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of AML
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Currently available combination chemotherapy for AML induces complete remission in about 75% of younger and 45% of older patients, but often fails to induce long-term disease-free survival and is toxic to normal hematopoietic cells. The frequent disease relapse observed in chemotherapy treated AML patients is thought to occur through the inability of the existing drugs to specifically target the self-renewing leukemia-initiating cells (LICs). These cells have the functional capacity to replenish AML blasts. An attractive target for AML therapy is the nuclear export protein exportin 1 (XPO1), which is functionally required for continuous nuclear export of a subset of proteins and mRNAs. Small molecule Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compounds covalently bind to Cysteine528 in the cargo-binding groove of XPO1 and inhibit nuclear export. The orally bioavailable clinical SINE compound, selinexor (KPT-330), is currently in Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials in adult patients with AML (NCT01607892, NCT02088541, NCT02249091, NCT02403310, NCT02093403, NCT02485535, NCT02299518, NCT02416908, NCT02212561, and NCT01607892) and in a Phase 1 trial for relapsed childhood ALL and AML (NCT02091245). The results of these trials are encouraging, as they have demonstrated that selinexor alone or in combination is active in inducing remission in patients with relapsed or refractory AML. Here, we explore the anti-leukemia activity of a next generation SINE compound, KPT-8602. In preclinical toxicology studies as well as clinical trials, noted adverse events for selinexor are anorexia with weight loss, fatigue and thrombocytopenia, which limit the frequency of dosing to no more than every other day, three times a week. KPT-8602 is orally bioavailable and has similar pharmacokinetic properties to selinexor, with reduced brain penetration. Preliminary toxicology studies in rats and monkeys suggest that KPT-8602 has a substantially better tolerability profile, with reduced fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and anorexia compared to selinexor. Thus, KPT-8602 can be dosed orally on a daily basis for 5 days each week. The increased drug exposure with daily dosing and better tolerability of KPT-8602 leads directly to superior efficacy in pre-clinical models compared with selinexor. To define the anti-leukemia activity of KPT-8602 against primary AML blasts and LICs in a relevant pre-clinical setting, we established patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, in which leukemic blasts from AML patients were transplanted into immunodeficient NOD-SCID-IL2Rcgnull (NSG) mice. Mice engrafted with leukemic blasts were treated with vehicle, selinexor (20 mg/kg three times per week), or KPT-8602 (15 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks). KPT-8602 was highly active against blast cells from three patients with poor-prognosis disease (cytogenetically normal AML with FLT3-ITD (AML-CN), AML with complex karyotype (AML-CK), and MDS-derived AML (MDS/AML)), as evidenced by a reduction in leukemic engraftment in primary mice after treatment (Fig. 1A-C). At these doses, KPT-8602 demonstrated higher anti-leukemic activity than selinexor, with no leukemic cells detected in the bone marrow of two of the eight AML-CN PDX treated mice (Fig. 1A-C). In secondary transplantation assays, KPT-8602 greatly reduced the frequency of LICs in the PDX model derived from AML-CN cells, indicating that this agent not only targets the bulk leukemic cells, but also eliminates LICs (Fig. 1D). In mice engrafted with normal cord blood human CD34+ cells, KPT-8602 reduced bone marrow human CD45+ cell numbers (Fig. 1E), but the impact on normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, as determined by secondary transplantation assays (Fig. 1E), was modest when compared to the LIC reduction after KPT-8602 treatment. These findings demonstrate that KPT-8602 has better tolerability, perhaps through decreased CNS penetration, and is better at eliminating both AML LIC and blast cells when compared to selinexor. Therefore, KPT-8602 should be tested for efficacy and tolerability in patients with relapsed and refractory AML, with the goal to overcome a difficult obstacle in curing AML; destroying the LIC compartment while sparing normal hematopoietic cells. Disclosures Etchin: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Baloglu:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Landesman:Karyopharm: Employment. Senapedis:Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Ellis:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. McCauley:Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Stone:Agios: Consultancy; AROG: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Other: DSMB for clinical trial; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. DeAngelo:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Kauffman:Karyopharm: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm: Employment, Equity Ownership. Look:Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».