MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W234901646

What I Learned about Teaching at the Great Wall of China: You Wouldn't Think a Veteran Teacher with More Than Three Decades of Experience Would Need to Reinvent Himself and His Methods. but Half a World Away, Mr. Squire Did Just That

2007· article· en· W234901646 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhi Delta Kappan · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueInnovative Educational Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChinaBeijingPsychologyMetaphorPedagogyMedia studiesSociologyLawPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

AS I PAUSED to gaze across the magnificent panorama spread before me, it struck me: I was in another world--China. I had no idea that what I imagined as a leisurely stroll on the Great Wall of China would turn out to be such a strenuous workout, much less a metaphor for my teaching experience in China. wall, which snakes over the rugged mountain terrain at Badaling (60 kilometers north of Beijing), presented a mostly uphill climb. After two hours of climbing, I felt the familiar endorphin rush and clear-headedness that I experience after a good run. What an extraordinary time and place to reflect on my first week of teaching in China. THE FIRST DAY There I was, severely jet-lagged on my first full day in China, standing in front of my class of 28 eager Chinese teachers. My students, all teachers of English in their own elementary schools and selected to participate in this four-week English-immersion program, had two expectations of the course. First, they wanted to improve their English skills, particularly the ability to speak and understand spoken English. Second, they expected to learn new and innovative teaching methods. Of course, my first challenge that day was staying awake. Day and night seemed completely reversed, and my body fought hard against the absurd times for sleeping, waking, and eating. Nevertheless, I felt confident, armed with my opening activities: a partner exercise, in which everyone would be interviewed and then introduced by a classmate, and what I thought would be a delightful game with idioms. What a shock to realize with increasing clarity as the morning wore on that all of my carefully planned lessons completely missed the mark. students were gracious and genuinely friendly, all the while utterly unable to make any sense whatsoever of my rapid-fire chatter and ever-changing arrangements with partners and small groups. As for the idiom activity, they obligingly went through the motions of finding the person with the matching idiom or explanation and then tried with excruciating futility to explain the literal as well as colloquial meanings of the phrases. I practically stood on my head to help my students understand such idioms as a mountain out of a while they frantically checked their electronic English translators for the meanings of molehill and every other word in my well-intended definition (It means to blow an issue or event out of proportion, such as: 'You have only a small blister on your heel, but you complain as though you broke your leg. Why are you making a mountain out of a molehill?'). I used exaggerated sign language to clarify every word. Even then, I was faced with mostly blank looks and rapidly fading smiles. I could almost see the smoke rising from their nifty translating machines. Okay, I had to admit to myself, this lesson was a tad too complicated and the vocabulary far too extensive for novice English learners. In the afternoon, I introduced the children's story called The Hockey Sweater, by Roch Carrier, which I had so cleverly chosen for its humorous Canadian content. As planned, I read the first few pages aloud, mustering superb expression to illustrate the plot, careful to pause long enough to define what I knew would be unfamiliar words. My students smiled and laughed continually. What a relief! They must have understood and thoroughly enjoyed the story, I thought. I instructed them to discuss with a partner their predictions of what would happen next and then write their ideas in their notebooks. My illusion that the students had at least a rudimentary grasp of the story was shattered that evening as I read their journals. Student after student, with the best spelling and grammar they could manage, thanked me for being their teacher, declared how much they appreciated my easygoing manner, and then, as politely as possible, proceeded to inform me that they understood nothing of the entire first day. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,281
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,097
Tête enseignante GPT0,421
Écart entre enseignants0,324 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle