MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W235114561 · doi:10.1177/070674370605101010

Book Review: Developmental Issues: The Development of the Person

2006· article· en· W235114561 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueFamily Dynamics and Relationships
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Developmental Issues The of the Person L Alan Sroufe, Byron Egeland, Elizabeth A Carlson, W Andrew Collins. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2005. 384 p. US$40.00. Reviewer rating: Excellent The findings of the Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation From Birth to Adulthood, a longitudinal study that began in the mid 1970s and spans 3 decades, form the basis of this book. Longitudinal studies in child literature traditionally examine clinic populations or diagnostic groups or are epidemiologic. The Minnesota Study differs because the assessments began before the child's birth and the study's goal was to the general trends in development, as well as to describe the course of individual lives (p x) of children who were considered at higher risk of parenting difficulties than the general population. There were 2 inclusion criteria: that it was the last trimester of the mother's first pregnancy and that the mother qualified for US public assistance for prenatal and natal care for people living under the poverty line. The contents are arranged in 3 parts. The first part, Understanding Development, consists of 4 chapters. The opening chapter provides the rationale and outline of the study. In the second chapter, the authors explain their theoretical perspectives. The authors use the Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory as their conceptual model of development as well as their 3 guiding principles of unity, emerging complexity or self-organization, and the differentiation of development. The third chapter provides a detailed explanation of the authors' methodology, choice of timing, and instruments used for assessments. The fourth chapter details the follow-up strategy and provides excellent lists of salient developmental issues and changing issues in peer relations that guide the assessments. It ends with a note on ethical dilemmas and how they were dealt with while endeavouring to minimize confounding. The second part, Development and Adaptation, has 6 chapters. Each chapter is dedicated to one stage of development from infancy through toddler, preschool, middle childhood, adolescence, and finally adulthood. Adaptation in infancy provides findings from quality of caregiving, including maltreatment, infant-parent attachment, and contextual influences. These findings show that caregiving depends on several global, rather than specific, factors and is associated with parent and child strengths and vulnerabilities within the environmental context. Each stage of this book includes statistical support for these and other findings. Chapter 7, on preschoolers, presents results from 2 assessments: at age 3.6 years and again at age 4.6 to 5 years. They demonstrate the formation of a coherent personality; that is, a way of interacting socially and behaviourally that is consistent across situations. Chapter 8 reports on children's competence at a summer camp and at an elementary school. To assess social competence, a sample of 10-year-olds from the original 180 children was chosen to attend a camp. The findings revealed high correlations between attachment security and competence at camp. Regression analysis was conducted with controlling for many variables, including IQ. The results showed a highly significant correlation between quality of care and emotional health and peer competence. The Chapter on adolescence reports findings from assessments at ages 13 and 16 years, which, surprisingly, did not add to previous predictions and showed that early care predicts high school adjustment, even with controlling for IQ. The consequences of psychological, physical, and sexual maltreatment demonstrate not only their etiologic role in adolescent behavioural problems but also, remarkably, their insignificance for some of these children who were doing well. Chapter 10 examines adult competence at work, studies, and intimate relationships. These findings further strengthen the assertion that predictions of later outcomes were most powerful when early and later care were combined with measures of context and when both parental and peer relationships were taken into account. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,819
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle