MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W235496950

College Students' Chronological Age Predicts Marital Happiness Regardless of Length of Marriage

2010· article· en· W235496950 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCollege student journal · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyNeuroticismConscientiousnessEthnic groupMarital statusDemographyReligiosityHappinessPopulationLife satisfactionBig Five personality traitsClinical psychologyGerontologyPersonalityExtraversion and introversionSocial psychologyMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A revised version of the Quality Marriage Index (QMI) was used to examine demographic correlates of marital satisfaction. We administered the revised QMI to a sample of college students and found a significant positive correlation between age and relationship satisfaction. We suggest that this increase in relationship satisfaction could be due to age related increases in life satisfaction and age related increases in conscientiousness and decreases in neuroticism. ********** Nazarina & Schumm (2009) demonstrated that a shorted form of Norton's Quality Marriage Index (1983) was simple to administer and has sound reliability and validity. Given the convenience of this scale, we administered the revised Quality Marriage Index (QMI) to measure relationship satisfaction in married and cohabitating college students and to determine whether relationship satisfaction is related to demographic characteristics of this population. Method Participants Participants included sixty-nine undergraduate and graduate students enrolled at a 6,000 student university in Oklahoma of whom 49 were female and 20 were male. Participants included twenty-five freshman, twelve sophomores, three juniors, ten seniors, and nineteen graduate students. The sample consisted of Caucasians (30), African-Americans (15), Multiracials (13), Hispanics (6), Native-Americans (3), Asian-Americans (2) and 3 subjects did not indicate their ethnicity. Participants ranged in age from 18 to 54 years, M = 27.01. Materials Demographic information was collected using a self-report questionnaire. Information collected included gender, ethnicity, college major, years in school, religious affiliation, and self-reported religiosity. Participants also reported whether they were married or cohabitating, how many years they had lived together and the number of children that they had. A revised version of the Quality of Marriage Index (QMI) (Norton, 1983) was used to assess relationship satisfaction that has been reported to have sound psychometric properties (Nazarinia & Schumm, 2009). For this study we changed the word marriage in item 1 to relationship so as to include people in romantic relationships in general. The original QMI has solid psychometric properties, with reported internal reliabilities ranging from .89 to .99 (Knee, Patrick, Victor, Nanayakkara, & Neighbors, 2002; Neff & Kareny, 2004; Paleari, Regalia, & Fincham, 2005). The scale has demonstrated concurrent validity with the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (Calahan, 1997), which is another widely used measure of global satisfaction. The QMI has been used with married couples (Neff & Karney, 2004), including newlyweds (Palerari et al., 2005) and couples in medium and long term marriages (Paleari et al., 2005). It has also been used with engaged couples (Stafford & Canary, 1991), cohabitating couples (Kalbfleisch, 2001), and dating couples (Kabfleisch, 2001; Stafford & Canary, 1991). Nazarinia and Schumm (2009) reported psychometric properties for the revised version of the QMI. They report high internal consistency, with substantial test-retest reliability. The revised QMI has been used with undergraduate students in heterosexual, non-married (dating) relationships (Knee, et al., 2002) and with expectant and new Canadian mothers (Nazarina & Schumm, 2009). Design and Procedure Participants were instructed by a research assistant to read and sign an informed consent document which briefly outlined the nature of the study, the risks and benefits of participation in the study, and a statement of confidentiality. All participants filled out the forms in a group setting. The participants then filled out a short demographics questionnaire and the revised QMI. All of the participants completed the surveys voluntarily, were debriefed as to the nature of the study and were given extra credit in one college course by the relevant course instructor. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,063
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,385
Écart entre enseignants0,367 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle