MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W235582355

The Canadian Council of Churches: Its Founding Vision and Early Years, 1944-1964

2004· article· en· W235582355 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel C. Goodwin

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of ecumenical studies · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProtestantismArgument (complex analysis)LawSociologyPolitical scienceMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On April 15, 1964, emergency meeting of Executive Council of Canadian Council of Churches (hereafter, CCC) met at council's headquarters in Toronto. Twelve days earlier, William James Gallagher, founding general secretary of CCC, had died suddenly, following an illness of two months from which was hoped he would recover. (1) Since Gallagher was scheduled to retire in June of same year, his death did not leave unexpected gap to be filled. In fact, during previous four years, there had been challenging questions raised in many quarters about general direction and appropriateness of original vision of CCC--which had been forged in early 1940's--for dynamic and fast-paced 1960's. A. C. Forrest, editor of United Church Observer, noted of Gallagher and his generation of Protestant leaders that [w]e doubt that anyone will ever appreciate contribution--and difficulties--of these churchmen in World Council and National Councils who have our work. (2) If Gallagher and his colleagues pioneered important phase in cooperative Christianity and laid foundation for CCC, was thought by many Christian leaders in Canada--especially those in United Church of Canada--that more streamlined and fully integrated organization committed to fostering ecumenical encounter and action, as opposed to coordinating or reflecting departmental activities of [member] was necessary for future of council. (3) It is argument of this essay that CCC was successfully formed in 1944 with vision that was significantly grounded in late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century assumption of hegemony of nation's Protestant churches that was essentially British vision, which regarded national churches as key to sustaining and developing Christian ethos of nation. The Canadian Council was also inspired and shaped by realities and sense of crisis that accompanied World War II and desire for postwar reconstruction. As 1950's unfolded, council encountered increasing ambivalence due to hardening of denominational boundaries and growing popular opinion among many Canadians that their churches were becoming irrelevant to real life in midst of fast-paced change in postwar period. Consequently, many of CCC's initial goals, which included rebuilding Christian Canada, were not achieved and were largely jettisoned through reconfiguring council in mid-1960's with belief that days of unqualified Protestant power in English Canada had passed. Even if council had been more united and able to speak with louder singular voice, many of its leaders were convinced that by 1964 few of nation's leaders or ordinary citizens were listening. The CCC's initial mandate became casualty of Canadians' rejecting many of their colonial institutions, including large national centralized churches that made up most of council, as they attempted to find their way in post-colonial Western world. To date, CCC has received only passing mention by professional historians. Generally speaking, view portrayed in historiography is that CCC was casualty of circumstances. Writing in 1956, H. H. Walsh reported that CCC was unfortunately formed when there was definite trend away from spirit of war. (4) Sixteen years later, John Webster Grant argued that, whereas council provided a valuable means of consultation among its member churches, it suffered from certain ambiguity of origin, as was expression of previous cooperative efforts at local level and amalgamation of several existing ministry agencies. (5) Furthermore, Grant highlighted the unwillingness of churches to cooperate at all. (6) John Stackhouse, following insights of previous assessments, conceded that council failed to establish itself as innovative and forceful representative of mainstream of Canadian Protestantism. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,187
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,943

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0240,009
Communication savante0,0110,002
Science ouverte0,0030,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,078
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of ecumenical studiesMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207