<i>States of Obligation: Taxes and Citizenship in the Russian Empire and Early Soviet Republic</i> by Yanni Kotsonis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
States of Obligation: Taxes and Citizenship in the Russian Empire and Early Soviet Republic, by Yanni Kotsonis. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2014. xiv, 483 pp. $80.00 (cloth). States of Obligation provides a detailed examination of the development, reform, and implementation of the taxation system in late Imperial and early Soviet Russia. Focusing primarily on the post-Great Reforms era, Yanni Kotsonis explores both the intellectual and ideological objectives of taxation policies and the results of their practical application. He illustrates the shift to personal tax assessments and highlights the difficulties of establishing a system of direct individual universal taxation in a state where such obligations had been communal and determined according to privilege. In doing so, Kotsonis argues that the development and evolution of taxation policy was part of a broader modernization project that sought to redefine the very understanding of citizenship and the relationship of individuals to the state. Kotsonis situates taxation within the larger modernization project of the Russian Empire and Western Europe as a whole; indeed, he suggests that fiscal policies lay at the heart of the modernizing state. He places Russia squarely within that broader context, comparing Russian developments to those in Western Europe at the time. In order to implement a universal tax regime, the Russian government found it increasingly important to obtain knowledge of the individual and of corporate financial transactions. Collecting this information necessitated greater surveillance of the population and essentially made individual or corporate transactions the concern of the state. This knowledge, Kotsonis argues, led to a shift in the relationship between the state and the individual as new tax policies attempted to make tax bills more proportionate to income, subjecting the individual to assessment. Through taxation, the government established a new model of citizenship that emphasized civic-mindedness and responsibility in place of rights. Ultimately, taxation became the marker of citizenship rather than estate status, minimizing collective relationships in favour of a direct bond between the individual and the state. Kotsonis provides a detailed and comprehensive account of the taxation system reforms in the late nineteenth century, describing the bureaucratization and professionalization of tax collection, as well as the changing definition of the person (corporate and individual). Corporations, encouraged to write off expenses that could be documented, reported the details of their business dealings, which allowed commercial transactions to be traced, recorded, and taxed to a greater extent. Urban areas saw the imposition of new taxes, for example, the apartment tax, which made use of both universalistic and individual principles by establishing an individual assessment that could potentially be applied to any taxpayer. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».