19 CREATING A WEB-BASED Multimedia resource for medical students learning pediatric clinical skills.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3>Background</h3> Our department of pediatrics has sponsored a student-led initiative to create an interactive audiovisual database of pediatric clinical skills. Learnpediatrics.com, is an on-line educational tool made up of modules developed by medical students, with resident and faculty oversight, for the educational benefit of those learning clinical skills in pediatrics. The initial material was very positively received and has been used as a model by other educators. However, the development process used with early modules proved inefficient. We report a new and effective process. <h3>Objectives</h3> (1) To create a comprehensive Web-based resource for medical students learning pediatric clinical skills; (2) to incorporate multimedia elements as learning aids; (3) to retain the project9s core vision of creating a resource built and organized by medical students. <h3>Methods</h3> The content and links of the initial module (Respiratory) were developed by students from UBC Medical School, working with education and clinical faculty over a 2-month time frame, then filmed and posted on the Web by a contracted software company. In subsequent years, similar summer-based activity failed to complete the modules on schedule. In the spring of 2005, a new approach for creating content was adopted. The project leaders approached students prior to their 2-month clinical pediatric clerkship rotation. Interested medical students then developed relevant content for the Web site as part of their rotation requirements under the direction of a pediatric resident. This also gave them opportunities to liaise with medical educators and clinical faculty. <h3>Results</h3> This approach ensured enthusiastic delivery of content, continuity, manageable tasks for the students, residents, and faculty, and completion of an entire Neurology module. Using guidelines provided by the project leaders, 15 medical students could write on topic areas, pose questions, have ongoing input, and learn from the filming of the clinical examination skills component demonstrated by faculty. The material was collected 8 weeks later and then reviewed and edited by a team of residents, teaching fellows, and faculty. <h3>Discussion</h3> Our new method of content creation during clinical rotations has resulted in a new module and generated sufficient enthusiasm across the team that we are continuing with this method and anticipate completion of our next module, Cardiology, by January 2006. Once Learnpediatrics.com is completed, we hope that it will continue to be an educational tool that can be accessed by medical students around the world.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,100 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».