MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2364192138

Self-activation of PMNs in Systemic Onset JIA

2006· article· en· W2364192138 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xu Hon

Notice bibliographique

RevueChinese Journal of Evidence-Based Pediatrics · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineEtiologyArthritisScrutinyKawasaki diseaseRheumatologyImmunologyGastroenterology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objective The diagnosis and treatment of systemic onset JIA (juvenile idiopathic arthritis) are problematic in clinic since its etiology is still unclear .Some studies suggest that PMNs (Polymorphonuclear Neutrophils) take an important role in the occurrence and development of JIA. To investigate the association between the function of PMNs and the clinical features of JIA and other rheumatic diseases,the proportions of self-activated PMNs in these diseases were evaluated and compared.Methods According to the criteria set in 2001 in Canada,18 patients with systemic JIA were enrolled in the study.Meanwhile,15 patients with oligoarticular JIA,10 patients with KD (Kawasaki Disease),9 patients with SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus) and 27 healthy children with similar age were enrolled as negative controls. To evaluate the levels of self-acitvated PMNs in the patients,four scrutiny points were taken according to the developments of the diseases. The first scrutiny point was from 1 to 5 days after when the patients were admitted the hospital; the second scrutiny point was from 8 to 17 days after the first scrutiny when the symptoms of the patients were relieved; and the third and forth scrutiny points were from 28 to 42 days and from 53 to 70 days after the first scrutiny points,respectively. All the patients were followed up for at least 1 year so that the diagnoses were confirmed. To evaluate the levels of self-activation,DHR (dihydrorhodamine) assay was taken in the four scrutiny points. For each patient,0.5 mL of Heparin anticoagulated venous blood was collected. 50 μL of blood was incubated in PBS (phosphate buffer solution) and PMA (phorbol myristate acetate) respectively for 15 minutes at 37℃ and then incubated with 25 μL of DHR for 5 minutes at 37℃. After that erythrocytes were removed by adding 2 mL of hemolysis and cells were washed once using PBS. Cells were resuspended in 500 μL of PBS and then tested by Flow cytometry. CRP (C reactive protein) and ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) of each patient in routine.Results At the first scrutiny point,the average proportion of self-activated PMNs in systemic JIA patients was (33.94±24.95)% while the average MFI (mean fluorescent intensity) was 10.68±5.03 and they were significantly higher than the negative controls [the proportion of self-activated PMNs and MFI were (8.02±8.11)% and 3.18±1.05,respectively,P0.01)]. The proportion of self-acitivated PMNs and MFI of other rheumatic patients were: oligo-JIA [(5.58±2.77)%,3.38±0.69]; KD[(10.65±6.65)%,4.19±1.14]and SLE [(7.29±2.97)%,3.73±0.87 ]and they were all at the same level of negative controls. At the second scrutiny point,the CRP and ESR levels declined to (34.50±33.65) mg·L~ -1 and (49.56±31.43) mm·h~ -1 ,respeceively(P0.01). The proportion of self-activated PMNs did not decline sighificantly. At the third scrutiny point,the proportion of self-activated PMNs and MFI declined significantly to (7.00±2.96)% and 4.32±1.31,respectively (P0.01). Conclusions PMNs were significantly self-activated in systemic onset JIA patients which suggested that PMNs took an essential role in the pathology of systemic onset JIA while oligo-JIA and other rheumatic disease had no sign of PMNs self-activation.As the relief of clinical symptoms,the proportion of self-activated PMNs decreased significantly which confirmed the role of PMNs in systemic onset JIA. DHR assay could be a valuable test in the diagnosis of systemic JIA and could also be a useful test to evaluate the activity of systemic JIA.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,442

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,281 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChinese Journal of Evidence-Based PediatricsMême sujetAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchTravaux en français237 207