MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2376351658 · doi:10.14288/1.0063261

Community-based, macro-level collision prediction models

2010· article· en· W2376351658 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMacroCollisionComputer scienceComputer security

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The burden on communities due to the enormous economic and social costs associated with road collisions has been recognized worldwide as a major problem of epidemic proportions. Given the magnitude and persistence of the problem, spanning many decades, organizations worldwide have initiated engineering and research programs to improve road safety. There are two main transportation engineering approaches to improving the safety performance of the road component: reactive and proactive. The reactive or traditional engineering approach has been to address road safety in reaction to existing collision histories. While it has proven to be very successful, road safety authorities and researchers are also pursuing more proactive engineering approaches. Rather than working reactively to improve the safety of existing facilities, the proactive engineering approach to road safety improvement focuses on predicting and improving the safety of planned facilities. Reactive and proactive programs both rely heavily on reliable empirical techniques, including collision prediction models (CPMs). Reactive programs use micro-level collision prediction models, which focus on a single facility. Reliable micro-level C PM methods and techniques have been well researched and refined. However, while micro-level CPMs successfully support the reactive engineering approach, several shortcomings have been identified related to unsuccessful attempts by planners and engineers to use them in proactive road safety planning. Given these shortcomings of micro-level CPMs in planning-level (i.e. macro-level) road safety evaluations, there exists a research gap of reliable empirical tools to pursue road safety in a proactive manner. In view of this lack of reliable macro-level empirical tools, the main goal of this thesis was to develop macro-level CPMs, and to provide guidelines for their use by planners and engineers, so that road safety could be explicitly considered and reliably estimated in all stages of the road planning process. The approach taken included developing macro-level CPMs using extensive data extraction and Generalized Linear Regression Modeling (GLM) regression techniques, and then developing guidelines for use of those models based on several case studies of road safety planning applications. This thesis describes the results of that research on the development and use of community-based, macro-level CPMs using data from 577 neighbourhoods or Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) across the Greater Vancouver Regional District in British Columbia, Canada. The models predict mean collision frequency based on associations with variables from one of four neighbourhood characteristic themes, including exposure, socio-demographics (S-D), Transportation Demand Management (TDM), and network. A set of model use guidelines has also been proposed. To test whether the developed models and guidelines could be practical and relevant for practitioners, this research has also demonstrated the use of macro-level CPMs in several reactive and proactive case studies. The development of models and model-use guidelines in this research, together with their application in several case studies, have been offered as contributions toward addressing the research gap that has limited the effectiveness of the proactive engineering approach in road safety improvement programs. It is believed that these tools will contribute significantly to improved safety planning decisions by community planners and engineers, significantly enhanced effectiveness in road safety improvement programs, and, ultimately, to long term social and economic benefits for all communities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,914
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle