MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W237655843

Evolution of a Reference Source

2001· article· en· W237655843 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen R. Díaz, Judith Overmier

Notice bibliographique

RevueReference & User Services Quarterly · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLibrary scienceDirectoryDisciplineSociologyLawHistoryMedia studiesPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Documenting International Psychology from 1929 to 2000 While this column is about a resource that is Off the Shelf but not Onto the Web, it is a wonderful recounting of how the times and the technology shape the information resources we use. Content, culture, and format play against each other to forge new tools. Please enjoy this account of the evolution of an important reference source that has chosen an alternative electronic format.--Editor Every reference source has its history. Its content; the work of its sponsors, editors, authors, publishers; its format; its goals; its audience are all shaped by the disciplinary culture surrounding it and it, in turn, helps shape that culture. The reference tool Psychology: IUPsyS Global Resource is no exception; it has evolved over forty-two years in a disciplinary culture imbued with science and international communication. Four notable markers of that culture were the early establishment of an international congress series, the publication of an international directory of psychologists, the publication of an autobiographical source with an international base, and the formation of an international association. The First International Psychology Congress European psychologists initiated a series of international congresses in 1889. The first one was held in Paris at the same time as the Paris International Exposition and the year of the opening of the Eiffel Tower, where the congress held its closing banquet on the first level, which afforded a spectacular nighttime view.[1] The congresses have continued to be held every three or four years, except in times of war, since then. The First International Psychology Directory In 1929 Carl Allanmore Murchison (1887-1961), an American psychologist, edited the first international directory of psychologists, the Psychological Register. The Register contained the vitae and bibliographies of approximately 1,250 psychologists in twenty-nine countries.[2] Psychologists from universities in eight countries assisted Murchison in the compilation of entries. It took them three years just to gather the data for that first directory, which perhaps should have been a warning to the committee eager twenty-five years later to produce the new international directory of psychologists featured in this article.[3] Murchison's directory included the United States--all full members of the American Psychological Association and all association members with Ph.D.s were sent questionnaires. In other countries psychologists had to be nominated by a member of the editorial board to be queried for inclusion in the directory. The committee members were active participants in the process.[4] Nevertheless, Murchison, like most directory editors, worried about complete coverage. He thought that the directory didn't have full coverage of Holland, Latin America, and the U.S.S.R.[5] He invited information about Mexico and Central and South America to improve the next edition. Murchison's directory is arranged by country, continent & empire. It is a bit idiosyncratic, one feels, when one sees that America includes the United States and Canada, which between them comprise the first 296 pages, a little more than half of the directory. They are followed by the British Empire (sans Canada). History and geography lessons for modern readers abound throughout Murchison's directory, with France including Algeria and Germany including the Free State of Danzig. Individual entries in Murchison's directory include name, address, birth date and place, degrees and institutions where they were awarded, positions held, memberships, and publications. An alphabetical index by individual names is provided; the volume is 580 pages, hardbound, cloth. The First International Psychology Autobiographical Reference Source It is also worth noting that Murchison, Edwin Garrigues Boring (1886-1968), and Herbert Sidney Langfeld (1879-1958), along with two other psychologists, were the selection committee for another reference tool suggested by Boring that maintained a distinctly international flavor for its first several volumes. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCommunication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,978
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,233

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,049
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0220,026
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,008
Communication savante0,0220,016
Science ouverte0,0030,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0700,034

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReference & User Services QuarterlyMême sujetAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyTravaux en français237 207