MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2380147224

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-2 Involved in FGF-21-mediated Glucose Metabolism

2009· article· en· W2380147224 sur OpenAlexaff
Ren Gui

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueFibroblast Growth Factor Research
Établissements canadiensCAE (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFibroblast growth factorReceptorChemistryAdipocyteInsulin receptorFGF21Lipid metabolismCell biologyBiochemistryInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyAdipose tissueInsulinInsulin resistanceMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

FGF-21 is a new member of FGF family and reported to regulate glucose metabolism, as well as lipid homeostasis, therefore, FGF-21 is a potential therapeutics for treatment of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. However, little is known about its functional receptor(s) and mechanism of action. The aim of the paper is to investigate the functional receptor(s) for FGF-21 in order to understand the mechanism of action of the molecule. Previous result showed that FGF-21 could stimulate glucose uptake in differentiated 3T3L1 adipocytes, but not in pre-adipocytes, suggesting that differentiated 3T3L1 adipocytes express functional receptor (s) for FGF-21. Therefore, the differentiated 3T3L1 adipocyte is a perfect target for searching receptor (s) of FGF-21. 3T3L1 pre-adipocytes were differentiated into adipocytes. The cell membrane of the life adipocytes were incubated with FGF-21 which was labeled with either Flag-tag or biotin, the FGF-21/receptor complexes were cross-linked once they interacted by cross-link reagent BS3. The FGF-21/receptor complexes were immunoprecipitated by either Flag antibody or streptavidin and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The results showed that FGF-21 could form putative FGF-21/receptor (s) complexes with surface membrane protein of differentiated 3T3L1 adipocytes, not pre-adipocytes. The molecular mass of the complexes is proximate 300~400 ku. The complexes were formed by the FGF-21 labeled with either Flag-tag or biotin, suggesting the complex formation was not influenced by different labeling. To understand the component of the FGF-21/receptor(s) complexes, Western blot assay was used to examine the interaction of the complexes with known antibodies. FGFR-2 was detected within the FGF-21/receptor complexes by specific antibody for FGFR-2. To confirm the specific relationship between FGF-21 and FGFR-2, FGF-21-induced FGFR-2 tyrosine-phosphorylation was studied in 3T3L1 adipocytes. The results showed that although FGFR-2 was expressed in both pre-adipocytes and adipocytes FGF-21 could only enable adipocyte-expressed FGFR-2 tyrosine phosphorylation, which was consistent with glucose-uptake by FGF-21 in this two cell types. FGF-21 not only phosphorylated in situ adipocyte-expressed FGFR-2, but also ectopically expressed FGFR-2 in mouse pre-B cell line BaF3 cells. Sequencing analysis of FGFR-2 cDNA fromadipocytes revealed that FGFR-2Ⅲc was the only subtype of FGFR-2 expressed in adipocytes, suggesting that FGFR-2Ⅲc is at least one of the functional receptors for FGF-21 and involved in glucose metabolism in the cells. In order to understand the reason why the same FGFR-2 only functions in adipocyte and not in pre-adipocytes, differential expression of FGFR-2 before and after 3T3L1 cell differentiation was systematically analyzed, the result showed that adipocytes expressed high level precursors of FGFR-2, which were not observed in pre-adipocytes, suggesting FGFR-2 turn-over rate could be a key factor to determine the function the molecule. Alternatively, adipocyte-specific molecules could be another key factor participating the signal transduction of FGF-21.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,085
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetFibroblast Growth Factor ResearchTravaux en français237 207