The Moderating Role of Cognitive Fit in Consumer Channel Preference
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT Past studies showed that, to deploy the best possible consumer interface, companies must pay close attention to the factors and the consumer behavior that lead to channel preference. This study presents the results of an experiment designed to improve our knowledge of consumer channel preference by testing cognitive fit theory in a commercial context. Data from two different samples (749 students dealing with the process of buying a computer from a well-known electronic goods retailer and 290 union members attempting to buy an airplane ticket from a well-known travel agency) were analyzed. Our results show that the cognitive fit level, or the fit between how information is presented to the consumer (i.e., online store vs. bricks-and-mortar store of the same retailer) and the nature of the problem to be solved (i.e., the information search task), moderates the relationship between the individual characteristics and product characteristics identified in past studies and consumer channel preference. The findings of this research support cognitive fit theory in a commercial context and open up a new way of explaining consumer channel preference. Theoretical and managerial implications, limitations on the study and future research directions are discussed. Keywords: electronic commerce, consumer channel preference, consumer interface, consumer behavior, multi-channel. 1. Introduction In the last two decades, many new technologies such as the Internet have been invented and used by companies to do business. The use of these technologies has radically transformed commercial practices (Yao and Liu 2005). The fast growth of technological innovations, the impressive number of technologies available and their multiple functionalities have increased the complexity of managers. tasks and raised new challenges and problems for companies that want to design an effective and efficient consumer interface (Madlberger 2006; Rosenbloom 2007). Many studies concerned with the strategic dimensions of electronic commerce have concluded that one key factor for the success of e-commerce practices is the deployment of a consumer interface focused on consumer needs (Lin 2003; Stone et al. 2002; Willcocks and Plant 2001). The choice of a channel is the first decision that consumers make, and it shapes their entire shopping process (Keen et al. 2004). This means that companies must pay close attention to the factors and the consumer behavior that lead to channel preference. The development of such knowledge would help businesses make better decisions about implementing e-commerce practices and designing effective and efficient channel interfaces geared to consumers. Such knowledge could enable them to stand out from the pack and enhance the value of their products and services (Currie and Parikh 2006). This paper presents the results of an empirical design to develop an understanding of consumer preference by testing cognitive fit theory in a commercial context. More specifically, our objective is to link the antecedents of consumer channel preference identified by past studies with cognitive fit. Accordingly, we first present the factors identified in past studies as impacting consumer channel preference. We then examine cognitive fit theory. Third, we describe the methodology used to test the proposed hypotheses. Next, we present the analyses and results and, finally, we discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these results, their limitations and avenues for future research. 2. Literature Review 2.1. Antecedents of Consumer Channel Preference Factors identified in previous studies provide vital input in explaining consumer channel preference. Based on the results of meta-analyses presented by Constantinides (2004), Chang et al. (2005), and Zhou et al. (2007), we can summarize these factors in two major categories. The first category is related to individual characteristics. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle