MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2380728893 · doi:10.7326/acpjc-2004-140-1-a11

Patients at the center: In our practice, and in our use of language

2004· article· en· W2380728893 sur OpenAlex
Víctor M. Montori, P.J. Devereaux, Holger J. Schünemann, Mohit Bhandari

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueACP Journal Club · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCenter (category theory)Family medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

EditorialJanuary 1, 2004Patients at the center: In our practice, and in our use of languageGordon Guyatt, MD, Victor Montori, MD, P. J. Devereaux, MD, Holger Schünemann, MD, Mohit Bhandari, MDGordon Guyatt, MDDepartments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.), Victor Montori, MDDepartments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.), P. J. Devereaux, MDDepartments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.), Holger Schünemann, MDDepartments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.), Mohit Bhandari, MDDepartments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-2004-140-1-A11 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail In a formerly widespread approach to medical decision-making, physicians made a diagnosis, considered the management alternatives, and informed patients what would be done to help them. Decision-making rested exclusively in the physicians' domain.This parental model of patient care challenged clinicians to interpret what was best for their patients. How much benefit must a treatment offer before it was worth subjecting a patient to its short-term side effects, long-term risks, inconveniences, and costs? With the clinician at the center of decision-making, the question was whether a treatment effect was "clinically relevant." Even in the discipline of health-related quality-of-life measurement, investigators ...References1 Arora NK, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Med Care. 2000;38:335-41. [PMID: 10718358] Google Scholar2 Stapf C, Mohr JP. Ischemic stroke therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:453-75. [PMID: 11818485] Google Scholar3 Inzerillo A, Iqbal J, Troen B, Meier DE. Skeletal fragility in the elderly. In: Cassel CK, ed. Geriatric Medicine: An Evidence-based Approach. 4th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003. Google Scholar4 Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:781-8. [PMID: 1900101] Google Scholar5 Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL; Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321-33. [PMID: 12117397] Google Scholar6 Xamoterol in severe heart failure. The Xamoterol in Severe Heart Failure Study Group. Lancet. 1990;336:1-6. [PMID: 1694945] Google Scholar7 Packer M, Carver JR, Rodeheffer RJ, et al. Effect of oral milrinone on mortality in severe chronic heart failure. The PROMISE Study Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1468-75. [PMID: 1944425] Google Scholar8 Packer M, Rouleau JL, Svedberg K, Pitt B, Fisher L. Effect of flosequinan on survival in chronic heart failure: preliminary results of the PROFILE study. Circulation. 1993;88(Suppl I):I-301. Google Scholar9 Hampton JR, van Veldhuisen DJ, Kleber FX, et al. Randomised study of effect of ibopamine on survival in patients with advanced severe heart failure. Second Prospective Randomised Study of Ibopamine on Mortality and Efficacy (PRIME II) Investigators. Lancet. 1997;349:971-7. [PMID: 9100622] Google Scholar10 Califf RM, Adams KF, McKenna WJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of epoprostenol therapy for severe congestive heart failure: The Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST). Am Heart J. 1997;134:44-54. [PMID: 9266782] Google Scholar11 Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, et al. Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. JAMA. 1995;273:703-8. [PMID: 7853627] Google Scholar12 Devereaux PJ, Anderson DR, Gardner MJ, et al. Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study. BMJ. 2001;323:1218-22. [PMID: 11719412] Google Scholar13 Whelan T, Sawka C, Levine M, et al. Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:581-7. [PMID: 12697850] Google Scholar14 Edwards A, Elwyn G. Evidence-based Patient Choice: Inevitable or Impossible? New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. Google Scholar15 Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651-61. [PMID: 10452420] Google Scholar16 Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ. 2001;322:468-72. [PMID: 11222423] Google Scholar17 O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001431. [PMID: 12804407] Google Scholar18 Berger M, Muhlhauser I. Diabetes care and patient-oriented outcomes. JAMA. 1999;281:1676-8. [PMID: 10328053] Google Scholar19 Sweeney KG, MacAuley D, Gray DP. Personal significance: the third dimension. Lancet. 1998;351:134-6. [PMID: 9439510] Google Scholar20 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Volume 1–Worldwide Evidence 1985-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1990. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.)Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (G.G., V.M., P.J.D., H.S., M.B.) PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoPatients at the center: in our practice, and in our use of language David S. Goldfarb Cited byOpioid Analgesic Use and Risk for Invasive Pneumococcal DiseasesToshihiko Takada, PhD and Yuki Kataoka, MD, MPH January 1, 2004Volume 140, Issue 1Page: A11KeywordsArrhythmiaAtrial fibrillationCardiac outputDrugsEjection fractionEnzyme inhibitorsHeartHeart failureHemorrhageHypertensionLipid profilesMyocardial infarctionPatient advocacyPatientsPrevention, policy, and public healthQuality of lifeStrokeTreatment guidelines ePublished: 9 March 2020 Issue Published: January 1, 2004 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2004 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,044
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,414

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,452
Écart entre enseignants0,397 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle