Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The basic conditions of more than 20 famous forestry ecological projects in the world are introduced, and among them, the 11 important projects are analyzed on scale, scope, investment, period and start\|up time (means the period from initiation to now) in single factor and multi\|factors using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results using AHP shows that the 10 largest forest ecological projects in the world are: Chinese Three\|north and Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Shelter\|belt Forest Development Project(TNYR), Chinese Natural Forest Protection Project(NFP), Chinese Conversion Croplands into Forests Project(CCF), Chinese Wildlife Conservation and Nature Reserve Development Project(WCNR), American Roosevelt Project(RS), former Soviet Stalin Rebuild Nature Plan(SRN), Canadian Green Plan(GP), Japanese Combating Mountains Plan(CMP), the Green Dam Project of the Five Countries in northern Africa(GDFC) and Chinese Fast\|growing and High\|yielding Timber Forest Development Project(FHTF). The result using single factor comparison indicate that the scale and scope of six Chinese projects are larger and investment was higher than those of foreign five ones. The period and start\|up time of foreign great Projects are longer than those of Chinese ones except TNYR. The start\|up time of Chinese great projects (not including TNYR) is from 1 year to 4 years, and that of foreign ones at least 12 years, generally more than 30 years, even up to 67 years. The result shows the strength and resolution that Chinese government thoroughly improve ecology environment. At the same time, it indicates that Chinese forestry ecology construction is just starting, and has more work to do. The development of Chinese and foreign forestry ecological projects is basically similar. This shows that the desire of people thirsting for good nature and environment is accordant as well as the ways of forestry ecological projects construction, in spite of the difference of countries and cultures. Compared with foreign forestry ecological projects, Chinese ones have their own features. The NFP is the important contribution of Chinese government to world ecology construction, and the model of combining combat with protection, which won extensive praise in the world. There are 1.3 billion people in China, and about 0 8 billion people are farmer. In order to improve ecology and bring benefits to offspring, Chinese government offers 300 billion RMB yuan to realize the CCF, which is unique in the history of foreign important ecological projects. The FHTF will thoroughly solve the problem of Chinese timber shortage, and is the only Project combining ecological projects with industry development. Those are enough to indicate the strength and verve that our government combats environment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».