Ridge-furrow planting with black film mulching over ridge and corn straw mulching over furrow enhancing summer maize's growth and nutrient absorption
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Precipitation shows frequent and great variability in arid and semi-arid region in northwest China where crop production is generally dependent on rainfall, therefore, rainwater harvesting has been widely used in northwest China for its capacity of conserving soil water, increasing crop production and improving water use efficiency. The main purpose of this study was to explore the effects of different rainwater harvesting patterns on growth and nutrient absorption and utilization of summer maize, and organic matter content and nitrate nitrogen distribution in soil. To achieve these goals, a 2-year field experiment was carried out in 2013 and 2014 at the Key Laboratory(108°24′E, 34°20′N) of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas sponsored by Ministry of Education, at Northwest AF University. Five kinds of treatments were conducted using a complete randomized block design with three replicates. They were ridge-furrow planting with transparent film mulching over ridge only(M1), ridge-furrow planting with corn straw mulching over furrow only(M2), ridge-furrow planting with transparent film mulching over ridge and corn straw mulching over furrow(M3), ridge-furrow planting with black film mulching over ridge and corn straw mulching over furrow(M4), and a control treatment of ridge-furrow planting without mulching both over ridge and furrow(CK). The accumulation of shoot dry mass, root growth(including root length, root surface area, root volume and total root dry weight), nutrient accumulation(including nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) and yield of summer maize and organic matter content and NO-3-N distribution in soil under different rainwater harvesting patterns were measured. In addition, nutrient use efficiency, nutrient uptake efficiency and partial fertilizer productivity among treatments were compared. The results showed that the aboveground biomass of summer maize matched the Logistic curve over time. Mulching treatments had larger theoretical values of aboveground biomass, longer durations of rapid accumulation period, and stronger root system than that of CK. And M4 had the highest level among the four mulching treatments. The results also indicated that root system mainly distributed in the depth of 0-40 cm and it tended to be shallower under mulching treatment. The rainwater harvesting pattern had impact on soil nutrients as well. For example, the content of organic matter under straw mulching(M2, M3 and M4) was significantly(P0.05) higher than that of CK and M1. M3 and M4 had a greater infiltration depth of nitrate nitrogen than others and the depth peaked to 200 cm, which could prevent nitrate nitrogen from deep percolation. The nutrient accumulation among plant organs was highest in fruit, followed by leaf, stem and root, and the amount of potassium in stems was slightly larger than that in leave. Compared with CK, the mulching treatments remarkably increased not only nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium uptake efficiency, but also the partial factor productivity of fertilizer. Among the 4 mulching treatments, M4 had the highest partial factor productivity of fertilizer, which was averagely increased by 8.37%, 14.93% and 3.74% compared with M1, M2 and M3 in the 2 years, respectively. In this study, taking plant growth, nutrient absorption, fertilizer use efficiency and soil fertility maintenance into consideration, the dual-mulching, especially the ridge-furrow planting with black film mulching over ridge and corn straw mulching over furrow could be an appropriate method for summer maize cultivation in drought area. The results above would provide valuable information for selecting efficient rainwater harvesting pattern to realize high and stable yield and sustainable agriculture development in semi-arid regions of China.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».